Tuesday, December 15, 2009 - 6:12 PM

There is an old saying among military experts that "amateurs talk strategy; professionals talk logistics." I was reminded of that while reading a recent commentary from my friends at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore. The somewhat arcane subject was the "carrying capacity" of the Straits of Malacca/Singapore, a vital maritime artery in South East Asia, and it reminded me that there are a host of issues in our globalized world that rarely get much elite or public attention, yet are absolutely vital to "business as usual." As this example suggests, a lot of them have to do with the principles, procedures and infrastructure that enable people and things to move from place to place cheaply and relatively efficiently.
At its narrowest point, the Straits of Malacca and Singapore are about 2.2 kilometers wide. Nearly 100,000 vessels transit the Straits each year -- carrying about a quarter of the world's traded goods -- and several recent studies project that as many as 150,000 vessels could be moving through the Straits by 2020. That many ships would exceed the Straits’ current "carrying capacity" (i.e., the number of ships that could move safely through it).
The key takeaway, however, is that "carrying capacity" is not a fixed number: The number of ships that can safely transit the Straits can be increased by timely government action to remove shipwrecks, improve navigation aids, tidal monitoring, and meteorological information, increase towing capacity, and other rather straightforward measures.
The good news, according to the RSIS commentary from which I gleaned this information, is that the three littoral states (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore) have adopted a proactive policy on this issue. As a result, "projects are already underway, or are being proposed, to address the safety of navigation issues in order to improve sea lane conditions, with the participation of all interested stakeholders." If only the negotiations in Copenhagen were this easy.
The broader lesson here has to do with the importance of maintaining public infrastructure -- roads, bridges, air terminals, electrical grids, maritime waterways, rail lines, etc. -- the sinews upon which global commerce depends. These policies aren't exactly sexy, but they aren’t frivolous luxuries either. Indeed, they are essential ingredients that make the modern world work. It wouldn't be such a bad thing if world leaders got asked more questions about what they were doing to improve national and global infrastructure, at least as often as they get asked about where they are planning to send troops or what they think about the latest celebrity scandal.
AFP/AFP/Getty Images
It is rather unfair of your good self Prof.Walt, to expect the majority of us; strategy talkers, to don the cap of logistics discussants,
khairi janbek.paris/france
A few years ago there was serious concern about Abu Sayyaf and related groups in Indonesia targeting US Naval operations in the straits via USS Cole-like operations.
Also, the littoral states have taken considerable efforts to curtail piracy of commercial vessels emerging along the Indonesian coast.
Trade through this avenue is directly impacted by terrorism.
"The Box" - you might find it interesting - it's about the standardized cargo container - needless to say, it's more captivating than it sounds, otherwise I wouldn't offer the prompt to read it.
About 80 percent of China's oil passes through the Straight, so you can bet they are paying attention. I hope OUR (U.S.) leaders are more concerned with the capacity of our port, road, and rail, infrastructure, and are paying attention to the expansion of the Panama canal.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1212013/Revealed-The-ghost-fleet-recession-anchored-just-east-Singapore.html
I do like the idea some govts. are thinking about the future and if the $ problems goes away in the next 20 yrs they could be ready for safe shipping in this region.
Then Gringo Malandro pointed out that 80% of China oil goes through the strait that made me think a little harder about what evil country could be thinking that controling the strait would slow down the looming giant of the region. Oh well I've run out of tin foil for my hat.
I do love the irony of China beating the US to minerals,natural gas, and oil around the world with out an Army occupying the country. What a concept paying for them and not in greenbacks I'm sure.
It would be a great move by the three countries if they had taken the measures to adopt the situations for their future needs. There are not many countries who would see how bright the future would be and take decision for that. We can also see that its a combination of efforts by three countries Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore.We should also see how they stand untied against a cause and for the welfare of all of them. Its a great example to follow for the other countries. The ship channel should be made to hold traffic for another 50 years or so in view, then only these countries would be able to get the most benefit from it.This form of transport is a vital part of the Cold Chain Logistics industry. Moreover adequate cover for Travel Insurance should be given for such mishaps.Indianapolis Movers
Stephen M. Walt is the Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE