Posted By Stephen M. Walt Share

I normally like a lot of Anthony Shadid's reporting, but one odd line leapt out of this story, which I read online in Hanoi this morning. He was discussing the turbulent political situation in Lebanon, and offered this unremarkable observation:

It is yet another episode in which the United States has watched -- seemingly helplessly -- as events in places like Tunisia, Lebanon and even Iraq unfold unexpectedly and beyond its ability to control."

Shadid is obviously right, but the observation itself is banal in at least two senses. First, even a country as powerful as the United States doesn't "control" an awful lot of events in world politics, and especially the internal maneuverings and struggles of a country like Lebanon. And the sooner that Americans dispense with the notion that we can reliably control events in far-away places, the better off we'll be.

Second, it is hardly surprising that the United States has steadily lost influence (note: not control) in the Middle East. We're hamstrung by the "special relationship" with Israel, which reduces our freedom of maneuvers, makes our rhetoric about justice and democracy and human rights look hypocritical, and angers millions of people around the Arab and Islamic world. We foolishly invaded Iraq and then bungled the job, which made us look both aggressive and incompetent. We continue to follow a failed policy toward Iran, which only seems to make Ahmadinejad stronger. And we help prop up authoritarian regimes that are deeply unpopular, favoring democracy only when the candidates we like win.

And then we wonder why we aren't able to "control" political events in Lebanon, and we're surprised that more honest brokers are acquiring greater influence? The mere fact that this trend seems surprising is itself quite eloquent testimony to the brain-dead nature of our Middle East diplomacy.

The only good news in this sorry tale is that the United States does not really have to "control" the Middle East. Our only vital strategic interest there is to ensure that oil continues to flow to world markets, and reliable access to oil only requires that the region not be controlled by a single hostile power. We don't have to control it; we just need to make sure that nobody else does. Our inability to dictate events in places like Lebanon may be inconvenient, but it's neither especially surprising nor even all that worrisome. But if you'd like the United States to have more genuine and lasting influence, then you'd better come up with an approach to the region that looks rather different than the one we've been following for as long as I can remember.

MARWAN IBRAHIM/AFP/Getty Images

 

BUDAHH

6:28 PM ET

January 19, 2011

hanstung and if we weren't hamstrung by this what than?

"We're hamstrung by the "special relationship" with Israel, which reduces our freedom of maneuvers, makes our rhetoric about justice and democracy and human rights look hypocritical, and angers millions of people around the Arab and Islamic world "

I am wondering what would be more different, I think that during the oslo accords Al qaeda attacked the Uss cole, and the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, this was during the "peace accords" , so maybe they were not motivated by The support of the U.S for the peace process but by this little devil called radical Islam.

The U.S is the main contributor to the U.N which supports a whole lot of palestinians everyday with food , medical services , schools etc. The U.S is also the number one contributor to the Palestinian Authority, it pays for the salaries of many "government workers" and also contributes to the well being of palestinians. For some reason the arab world doesn't seem to care about that neither do you or your journalist friends, maybe if the world would know they would appreciate the U.S a little more .

I wonder why are they so angry? Especially with the U.S ? Because they support Israel you say, I think they are just angry period and it wouldn't matter if Israel would not exist they would still be mad at the U,S . Israel is a nice way for their dictators to let the public steam. I think that the weakileaks documents showed that the main Issue today is Iran and not Israel. Al qaeda hates america for what it stands not because of Israel, the biggest problem in the middle east today is shia and sunna rivalry.

Dr walt says" makes our rhetoric about justice and democracy and human rights look hypocritical" , how is that by supporting the only country in the area which respects human rights and is a true democracy. It makes no sense, maybe the arab dictators do make us seem a little hypocritical when it comes to human rights and democracy but you have to admit that in this hostile area Israel is a good example for democracy and human rights.

Show me one military with better results in proportion to the amount of terrorists killed and civilians. I don't even want to state what the U>S record is.

If it wasn't for that special relationship you would have nothing to write about , you should be thankful. It is about time you and the extreme left elements in the world will understand that Israel is not that important, you guys give it way too much significance.

 

WIZARD44

6:55 PM ET

January 19, 2011

Really.......?

"........but you have to admit that in this hostile area Israel is a good example for democracy and human rights."

The 2009 seige of Gaza & the on-going prison camp imposed by Israel on its residents, speaks volumes on Israel's disregard for human rights beyond its immediate borders.

 

VIVID_HAZE

9:26 PM ET

January 19, 2011

@BUDAHH

Spot on. FP definitely need to integrate a 'like' button into this comments system...

 

BUDAHH

11:10 PM ET

January 19, 2011

I haven't heard of any palestinian who starved to death

and gaza has a boarder with Egypt, when the ruling government of an enemy entity which declares their sole purpose id the destruction of Israel is in charge what are you supposed to do? , I would like to hear a solution from you, obviously the tunnels are working and there has been enough weapons, and terrorist that came back from training camps in Iran and syria that are back in gaza, Israel needs to protect it's citizens .

Before there was shooting at the passages there was no siege, there is one address for the blame , hamas. Israel still supplies electricity and water but to expect Israel to just let the terror heads smuggle whatever they want and bring in whoever they want in order to kill as many jews as possible is against common sense for a country who wants to protect it's citizens.

 

NEOLEFT

12:14 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Have you heard of any palestinian who were bombed to death?

Yes, Gaza has a boarder with Egypt, and Egypt does exactly as it it told by Washington and Tel Aviv. After all, who do you think paid for the steel undergound wall that was built by the US Army Copr of Enigneers?

"when the ruling government of an enemy entity which declares their sole purpose id the destruction of Israel is in charge what are you supposed to do?"

You mean the same government that:

a) removed the call for Israel's destruction from it's manifesto in 2006
b) supports a 2 state solution and has proposed a truce that Israel continues to reject?

"I would like to hear a solution from you, obviously the tunnels are working and there has been enough weapons, and terrorist that came back from training camps in Iran and syria that are back in gaza, Israel needs to protect it's citizens "

Where did you read that lovely bit of fiction Budahh?

"Before there was shooting at the passages there was no siege"

False. The siege effectively started the day after Israel withdrew from Gaza, beginning with 7,700 shells fired into Gaza over a period of 10 moths after the Israeli withdrawal.

Should we expect Hamas to just let the terror heads import whatever they want and bring in whoever they want in order to kill as many palestinian as possible Buddah?

 

HYLIA

12:15 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Look how bad the "Concentration Camp of Gaza" is

We'd expect an "ethnic cleansing" as many accuse Gaza is to reduce the population (like all other ethnic cleansings in the past). But either there is no ethnic cleansing or the Israelis are doing a pretty terrible job because the population has an annual growth rate of 3.29% a year, over twice that of Israel at 1.63% a year.

Fortunately those Turks are so generous that they keep sending their "Freedom Flotillas" over to keep the population healthy. Well they seem to be doing a good job seeing as the average life span in Gaza is 73.58, though I think the Gazans should be the ones sending the aid flotillas to Turkey seeing as Turkey's life span is 72.63.

Now lets look at how many people die annually according to a 2010 estimate. In Gaza the death rate is 3.36 per 1,000/yr, the 9th lowest in the entire world. It appears Gaza has a low death rate than Israel which has a 5.45. But it looks like we might have to pressure the U.N. to end the concentration camp in the U.S. which has 8.46 people dying each year.

My point, there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Whatever you might in the news, does not match up to statistics. Economic crisis, maybe, but it has not significantly hurt the wellbeing of the people. Now because I'm sure some people still won't want to admit it , and will do the easiest thing: question my source (though I think its harder to find a more accurate one), I invite you to go to a reputable organization (i'm sure the U.N. has it) and tell me if you find a major discrepancy in the statistics.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gz.html

 

HYLIA

12:16 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Neoleft

Have you ever heard of any Israelis who were bombed to death?

 

NEOLEFT

12:27 AM ET

January 20, 2011

@ Buddah

>> I think that during the oslo accords Al qaeda attacked the Uss cole

The same Olso accords that Bibbi dmiited to sabotaging on tape right? Common Buddah, who are you trying to kid? Even if you were to believe that the Oslo accords were not a complete fares, they were woefully inadequate and only a temporary solution.

"The U.S is the main contributor to the U.N which supports a whole lot of palestinians everyday with food , medical services , schools etc."

Except that almost none of which makes it's way into Gaza. It was revealed recently that the US has to bribe Israeli guards to allow these goods and services into Gaza.

"The U.S is also the number one contributor to the Palestinian Authority"

A Tiny amount, especially when compared to the biggest annual aid in the world, much of which is used to buy weapons which in turn are used to maintain the occupation. That doesn't include the automatic vetos at the UN, which allows Israel to steal land and maintain he occupation.

"I wonder why are they so angry? Especially with the U.S ?"

Just ask Bin Landen. apart from the one sided suport to Israel there is the presence of US bases in the Middle east, support for Arab dictators, and of course, the murder of over a million Iraqis.

"I think they are just angry period and it wouldn't matter if Israel would not exist"

What you think is interesting Bubahh but irrelevant. We already know what they think. Bin Lalden has even proposed a truce - stay out of the ME and we;ll stop attacking you.

"I think that the weakileaks documents showed that the main Issue today is Iran and not Israel."

Actually that's not what the weakileaks documents showed at all. What it showed was that the Arab dictators fear that Iran's policy of standing up to the West is inciting the Arab populations to stand up to their own dictators, which they despise.

"Al qaeda hates america for what it stands not because of Israel, the biggest problem in the middle east today is shia and sunna rivalry."

That's not what Al Qaeda has said, so what do you base this on Bubahh?

"how is that by supporting the only country in the area which respects human rights and is a true democracy."

Which country would that be Buddah? Israel's human rights record is appealing. They massacred 1,400 Palestinians in 2009, 330 of which were children.

"Show me one military with better results in proportion to the amount of terrorists killed and civilians."

What do you base the proportional figured on Buddah?

"It is about time you and the extreme left elements in the world will understand that Israel is not that important, you guys give it way too much significance."

It not us that gives it way too much significance, it's Washington.

 

BUDAHH

12:27 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Neoleft you are living on a different planet read amas charter

Yes, Gaza has a boarder with Egypt, and Egypt does exactly as it it told by Washington and Tel Aviv. After all, who do you think paid for the steel undergound wall that was built by the US Army Copr of Enigneers?

"when the ruling government of an enemy entity which declares their sole purpose id the destruction of Israel is in charge what are you supposed to do?"

You mean the same government that:

a) removed the call for Israel's destruction from it's manifesto in 2006
b) supports a 2 state solution and has proposed a truce that Israel continues to reject?

"I would like to hear a solution from you, obviously the tunnels are working and there has been enough weapons, and terrorist that came back from training camps in Iran and syria that are back in gaza, Israel needs to protect it's citizens "

Where did you read that lovely bit of fiction Budahh?

"Before there was shooting at the passages there was no siege"

False. The siege effectively started the day after Israel withdrew from Gaza, beginning with 7,700 shells fired into Gaza over a period of 10 moths after the Israeli withdrawal.

Should we expect Hamas to just let the terror heads import whatever they want and bring in whoever they want in order to kill as many palestinian as possible Buddah?

 

NEOLEFT

12:31 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Yes Hylia

I think that ended about 6 years ago and the number is about 10% of the number of Palestinians who were bombed to death.

 

NEOLEFT

12:34 AM ET

January 20, 2011

I have read the Charter and Meeshal has stated it is no

longer relevant. Furthermore, Hamas removed the call for Israel's destruction from it's manifesto in 2006.

On top of all this, Hamas has said it would abide by the Arab Peace Initiative (signed by 22 Arab States) which offers to not only recognize Israel, but normalize relations with Israel.

 

NEOLEFT

12:44 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Look how bad the "Concentration Camp of Gaza" is

The definition of ethnic cleansing is the removal of one population from a territory by another. It certainly does not imply a reduction of that population.

One need only look at a map of the OT between 1948 and today to see what ethnic cleansing looks like.

"Fortunately those Turks are so generous that they keep sending their "Freedom Flotillas" over to keep the population healthy."

You mean, the ones that Israel stops with it's piracy and massacres?

"Now lets look at how many people die annually according to a 2010 estimate. In Gaza the death rate is 3.36 per 1,000/yr, the 9th lowest in the entire world."

Gaza suffers from chronic malnutrition, which the recent Wikileaks cable revealed is precisely what Israel had hoped to achieve.

"Economic crisis, maybe, but it has not significantly hurt the wellbeing of the people."

One could have said the same thing about the residents of the Warsaw Ghetto. The lifestyle was lousy, but their well being was adequate right Hylia?

 

BUDAHH

1:09 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Neoleft you are living on a different planet read Hamas charter

http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/pdf/hamas_charter.pdf

I don't know where you heard that the hamas accepted the 2 state solution, and if they do why do they keep on calling for the destruction of Israel everyday?
A truce ? When did they offer a truce after cast lead, gee thanks, you are really doing us a favor, we want the terror to stop not to take a break so that they can rearm and train.
we never rejected a truce, we don't attack unless we are attacked so there is no need for a truce just don't attack and there will be no need for any truce, tell your friends in the hamas that.
when you want peace come and talk to us.

Why do they keep shooting rockets at israeli civilians years after cast lead? why do they target civilians do you have an excuse for that too.

Where did i read what fiction? Did you not watch the footage on Television of what you can bring through those tunnels, israeli security services say that and they are a lot more reliable than al jazeera. it is outrageous to think that Iran would train terrorists since they don't have anything to do with terror.

If we wanted to kill palestinians we can erase gaza off the face of the earth, I know that is what the other side would do if we were to switch places, what about the 8000 rockets fired at civilians deliberately, can you explain again . Israel acts in self defense against the terrorists who use their own civilians as human shields, we have no interest in killing anyone, terrorists are people who kill civilians to achieve a political purpose and that is what your buddies do , Israel never targets civilians.

Yeah blame bibi and not the biggest terrorist to ever live arafat, where do you think that gaza gets everything from you think that food and money and gas that go in there grow on trees in gaza, no the U.S and europe pay for most of it.
A tiny amount compare to Israel, maybe but what does the U.s get in return besides palestinians dancing after 9-11 and giving out candy, Israel is a true friend.

Blame the U.s for million dead Iraqis sorry that some arabs are animals and they kill each other for no reason, shia and sunna fighting and using terror against civilians is the U.S fault, you have some nerve.

oh so you are friend s with bin ladin now too, leave the middle east and we'll play nice no thanks osama, Radical Islam is the problem and not the U.S , poisonous ideology is the problem not the oppression of the poor arabs by the U.S , look at africa, you see the atrocities that take place there and people don't blow themselves up in the name of god except for in muslim areas.

The proportion is by the numbers which the army releases and it is verified by intelligence services, the hamas people slipped and when they were trying to say how much of terrorist they are they ad,itted to the right amount of terrorists killed in cast lead.

http://www.hudson-ny.org/1738/finally-a-hamas-leader-admits-that-israel-killed

go complain th the hamas for using civilians as shields.

 

NEOLEFT

1:47 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Time to update your talking points Budahh

Yes Buddah, the Hamas Charter does indeed contain some ghastly rhetoric. Written in war, for war, citing scripture also written in war, for war, it attempts to demonize the enemy. It’s the Hamas version of the USA’s Axis of Evil statement.

It does however contain a caveat, which is just as important as any other clause in a contract/charter/statement.In the propaganda war, the caveat is of course never cited.

Article Thirty-One: “As to those who have not borne arms against you on account of religion, nor turned you out of your dwellings, Allah forbiddeth you not to deal kindly with them, and to behave justly towards them; for Allah loveth those who act justly.” (The Tried – verse 8).

The writings of Israel's "founders" — from Herzl to Jabotinsky to Ben Gurion — make repeated calls for the destruction of Palestine's non-Jewish inhabitants: "We must expel the Arabs and take their places."

As for Hamas' acceptance of a 2 state solution, you could simply Google it yourself.

Hamas accepts two-state idea, says Carter
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/22/israelandthepalestinians.usa

Hamas 'implicitly accepts Israel'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5121164.stm

Hamas official says group ready for 'two-state' solution
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-04-07-hamas_x.htm

Hamas chief leaning towards two-state solution
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jQQms5pe3eJHtZXdqHjCT86hI67Q

Hamas 'implicitly accepts two statesolution
http://www.euronews.net/2006/06/27/hamas-implicitly-accepts-two-state-solution/

I don't know where you heard that the hamas accepted the 2 state solution, and if they do why do they keep on calling for the destruction of Israel everyday?

“When did they offer a truce after cast lead”

Do you even read the news?

Hamas says committed to mutual truce with Israel
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BN2O820101224

“we want the terror to stop not to take a break so that they can rearm and train.”

Hamas called for an end to suicide attacks in 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/apr/09/israel

“we never rejected a truce, we don't attack unless we are attacked”

False again. Israel broke the ceasefire in2008, choosing the say of the US presidential elections to attack.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians

“Why do they keep shooting rockets at israeli civilians years after cast lead?”

Who Hamas? Israel have admitted that Hamas are not firing the rockets, but of course, Israel refuse to lift the sirge and blockade, which is of course, an act of war.

Have you forgotten that Israel stated a war in 1967 because 5% of it's shipping access was blockaded by Egypt?

“Did you not watch the footage on Television of what you can bring through those tunnels”

I was asking about Iranian trained terrorists moving back and forth through tunnels. Any evidence of that?

“israeli security services say that and they are a lot more reliable than al jazeera”

No, Israeli security services are part of Israel's Hasbara, which includes preventing reporters from entering Gaza and seeing the reality for themselves.

“If we wanted to kill palestinians we can erase gaza off the face of the earth”

Do you live in Israel Budahh? Yes you could do that, but Israel's survival in incumbent upon it maintaining a facade of being the victim in the conflict.

“...what about the 8000 rockets fired at civilians deliberately, can you explain again”

What about the 7,700 shells Israel fired into Gaza in just 10 months, beginning with their withdrawal from Gaza. Can you explain that?

“Israel acts in self defense against the terrorists who use their own civilians as human shields”

Sorry but that's just old Hasbara. Israel uses human shields all the time. Shin Bet even appealed a Supreme Court ruling banning the use of human shields.

“terrorists are people who kill civilians to achieve a political purpose and that is what your buddies do , Israel never targets civilians.”

Really?

Ever heard of Arnon Soffer, a geostrategist from the University of Haifa and head of research for the IDF’s National Defense College:

‘The pressure at the border will be awful. It’s going to be a terrible war. So, if we want to remain alive, we will have to kill and kill and kill.’

The majority of those killed in Gaza and Lebanon before that were women and children.

“where do you think that gaza gets everything from”

it smuggles it through tunnels.

“A tiny amount compare to Israel, maybe but what does the U.s get in return besides palestinians dancing after 9-11 and giving out candy, Israel is a true friend.”

What about the 5 dancing Israelis? Were they an example of Israel being a true friend?
Was the statement by Bibbi, that the 911 attacks were very good for Israel, an example of Israel being a true friend?

“http://www.hudson-ny.org/1738/finally-a-hamas-leader-admits-that-israel-killed”

Sorry but that piece of right wing think tank propaganda has no credibility. Human Rights Watch and the UN have already produced the numbers and most of those killed were civilians. 330 children and 300 women. That means of the remaining 680 who were killed (men) would have to have all been Hamas, which they were not.

That article includes 250 police cadets as terrorists, which is ridiculous to say the least.

 

BASE

1:52 PM ET

January 20, 2011

@BUDAHH

Tell you what Budahh. I will happily stipulate that Hamas and Israel are equally odious and both engage in terrorism in the pursuit of their goals.

In terms of shear competence I would have to say that Israel are more effective terrorists than Hamas, but certainly rhetorically and legally equal in regards to their use of illegal tactics.

Is that better?

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:25 PM ET

January 20, 2011

HAMAS STILL WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL--PERIOD

Since Israel's complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005, Hamas and other terrorist groups operating out of the Hamas-controlled areas have fired thousands of rockets into Israel. Why does Hamas continue to rocket Jewish civilians within Israel?

Hamas' targeting of Jewish civilians is part and parcel of its mission — as set out in its governing Covenant or Charter — to "fight the Jews and kill them" and to replace Israel with an Islamic state. According to the Charter, any type of peace negotiation and diplomatic end to the conflict "stand in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement."

Moreover, HAMAS leaders still call for teh destruction of Israel, though more in addreesses to Arab-speaking audiences than to the Western press. They know how gullible people like NeoNut are, who hear only what agrees with their worldview. So, say something a bit more moderate in English, but then cry "Death to the Jews" (NOTE: NOT ZIONISTS!) in Arabic.

The Charter, and the intent to kill, remains the HAMAS raison d'etre.

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:44 PM ET

January 20, 2011

The Charter Seems to be Still in Effect ;>)

Mahmoud al Zahar, 2010:

"We have liberated Gaza, but have we recognized Israel? Have we given up our lands occupied in 1948? We demand the liberation of the West Bank, and the establishment of a state in the West Bank and Gaza, with Jerusalem as its capital – but without recognizing [Israel]. This is the key – without recognizing the Israeli enemy on a single inch of land...This is our plan for this stage – to liberate the West Bank and Gaza, without recognizing Israel's right to a single inch of land, and without giving up the Right of Return for a single Palestinian refugee.Our plan for this stage is to liberate any inch of Palestinian land, and to establish a state on it. Our ultimate plan is [to have] Palestine in its entirety. I say this loud and clear so that nobody will accuse me of employing political tactics. We will not recognize the Israeli enemy. ..we will not give up the platform of resistance, and the plan to liberate Palestine in its entirety. This is unequivocal..."

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:50 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Poor Neo Still Thinks There Was A Massacre in Gaza

Hamas Interior Minister Fathi Hamad admitted in Nov 2010 that Hamas and affiliated militias lost 600-700 fighters in the Israeli "Cast Lead" military operation. This undermines the central accusation of the Goldstone Report that the Israeli operation was "premised on a deliberate policy of disproportionate force aimed ... [at] the civilian population." Of course, Hamad's remarks have been largely ignored by major news organizations, like the New York Times and the BBC, because that detracts from the narrative of Palestinian victimhood so carefully cultivated by them.

Hamad's comments were made in an interview published in the London Arabic daily Al Hayat on Nov. 1, 2010 and reported by Agence France Presse (AFP), the Jerusalem Post and others. According to AFP, he stated:

"They say the people suffered from this war, but is Hamas not part of the people? On the first day of the war Israel targeted police stations and 250 martyrs were killed, from Hamas and other factions. In addition to them, between 200 and 300 fighters from the Al-Qassam Brigades (Hamas's armed wing) and another 150 security forces were martyred." (AFP, Nov. 1, 2010)

Hamad's figures closely match the Israeli estimate of 709 combatant fatalities and indicate that combatants comprised around half of the Palestinian fatalities in the time period of Dec. 27, 2008 through Jan. 18, 2009, far more than the 17 percent claimed by Palestinian groups. The increased ratio of combatants to non-combatants is inconsistent with Goldstone's most serious charge that Israeli forces systematically targeted civilians.

If five out of every six fatalities were non-combatants, as claimed by Palestinian sources, this would offer strong evidence of a systematic pattern of indiscriminate force and lend support to the even more serious allegation that Israeli forces intentionally targeted civilians. However, if around half or more of the fatalities were members of armed groups, the argument is much less compelling.

Hamad's admission gives greater credence to the assertion of British Colonel Richard Kemp that the Israelis acted with greater restraint than other military forces engaged in similar circumstances. The Israeli forces encountered an environment in which opposing forces were intermingled with civilian populations; distinguishing combatants from non-combatants was difficult. This difficulty was compounded by the intentional blending of civilians and combatants by Hamas. During the war, the New York Times reported that the Hamas leadership issued instructions for its fighters to shed their uniforms in order to blend in to the civilian population.

Avoiding civilian casualties is challenge for any military force under such circumstances and a balance is always struck. For example, a report by the BBC on May 15, 1999 highlights the realities of fighting irregular forces insinuated among civilians. After a NATO bombing attack on a Serbian village claimed the lives of nearly 100 civilians, NATO issued a statement that the village was a "legitimate military target" and that it had identified Serb forces dug into positions there. Nato said it "deeply regretted any accidental civilian casualties that were caused by the attack."

The civilian casualty counts in Iraq and Afghanistan offer even grimmer testimony to this reality. The UN Human Rights Council has singled out Israel for opprobation and the alleged ratio of non-combatant to combatant casualties provided a crucial pretext. Funny how no other nation on Earth is held to a standard even close to the one required of Israel. Smells like...I dunno...maybe...antisemitism!!??

 

THEANTICLAUS

8:33 PM ET

January 20, 2011

HAMAS CHARTER STILL IN EFFECT, NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY

In Gaza standing before 100,000 people, Ismail Haniyeh recently declared the objective of the Hamas movement. Neo's supposedly moderate prime minister of the moderate faction of the Palestinian religious movement publicly announced the peace solution for which his government is aiming:

The ultimate solution is not the total liberation of the Gaza Strip or a Palestinian state. It is the liberation of all of Palestine.

Haniyeh did not say so outright, but his words are clear. HAMAS is demanding Ramle and Lod, Haifa and Jaffa, Abu Kabir and Sheikh Munis. It is also demanding the land on which Israel stands, not some Palestinian entity separtate from israel. The land, the entire land. Greater Palestine.

In recent years, quite a number of experts, like NeoNut here, have promised us that HAMAS does not really mean it. HAMAS is only playing tough, but its intentions are lofty: cease-fire, Green Line, coexistence. Live and let live. But no message conveyed by any senior HAMAS member to any diplomat behind closed doors is equal in status to the message conveyed by Haniyeh to the masses. What counts is only the direct and open statement made by the Palestinian leader to his people. Palestine, all of Palestine. Every piece of Israeli land on which any Israeli citizen lives. His home, your home, our home. The land beneath our feet. That is not my idea of peace. Perhaps NeoNut would like to give his home to the Palestinians, or the Native Americans, but not me. If it comes down to me or him, I choose me! Who wouldn't?

 

NEOLEFT

1:04 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Even if they wanted to THEANTICLAUS, the couldn't

"Since Israel's complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005, Hamas and other terrorist groups operating out of the Hamas-controlled areas have fired thousands of rockets into Israel. Why does Hamas continue to rocket Jewish civilians within Israel?"

For a start, Israel fired as many shells into Gaza as all the rockets Hamas have fired.

Secondly, as Akiva Eldar has documented, Israel proceeded to strangle Gaza. Do you remember how Israel declared the blockade from Egypt an act of war?

"Hamas' targeting of Jewish civilians is part and parcel of its mission — as set out in its governing Covenant or Charter"

It must be Israel;s too since the IDF kill many more women and children than Hamas do.

"Moreover, HAMAS leaders still call for the destruction of Israel, though more in addreesses to Arab-speaking audiences than to the Western press."

They have also called for a 2 state settlement.

You can't have it both ways.

 

NEOLEFT

1:08 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Is 1,400 not a massacre ANTICLAUS

of the 600 Hamas killed in Cast Lead, half were police cadets, not terrorists. Hamas isn;t just a terrorist group, it is also the government in Gaza and employs public servants.

That leaved 330 children, 300 women and 250 public servants killed by Israel.

I do love how the story from that right wing think tank doesn't even link to the so called reports it claims to exist in the London Arabic daily Al Hayat, Agence France Presse (AFP) or the Jerusalem Post.

 

NEOLEFT

1:14 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Anticlaus verifies the 2 state solution endoresement from Hamas

Thanks THEANTICLAUS,

Yor quote just confirms that Hamas does indeed support a 2 state solution.

The liberation of the West Bank, and the establishment of a state in the West Bank and Gaza, with Jerusalem as its capital is indeed part of teh 2 state solution.

There is no law that requires any state to recognize another.

 

CAL

7:34 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Pitiful

The hasbara trainers should tell their people never to use cia.gov links that disprove what they are saying.

Economy - overview:
High population density, limited land and sea access, continuing isolation, and strict internal and external security controls have degraded economic conditions in the Gaza Strip - the smaller of the two areas in the Palestinian Territories. Israeli-imposed crossings closures, which became more restrictive after HAMAS violently took over the territory in June 2007, and fighting between HAMAS and Israel during December 2008-January 2009, resulted in the near collapse of most of the private sector, extremely high unemployment, and high poverty rates. Shortages of goods are met through large-scale humanitarian assistance - led by UNRWA - and the HAMAS-regulated black market tunnel trade that flourishes under the Gaza Strip's border with Egypt. However, chnages to the blockade in 2010 included moving from a white list - in which only approved items were allowed into Gaza through the crossings - to a black list, where all but non-approved items were allowed into Gaza through the crossings. Israeli authorities have recently signaled that exports from the territory might be possible in the future, but currently regular exports from Gaza are not permitted.

GDP (purchasing power parity):
see entry for West Bank

GDP - real growth rate:
see entry for West Bank

GDP - per capita (PPP):
see entry for West Bank

GDP - composition by sector:
see entry for West Bank

Labor force:
339,000 (2009)
country comparison to the world: 160

Labor force - by occupation:
agriculture: 12%
industry: 5%
services: 83% (June 2008)

Unemployment rate:
40% (2010 est.)
country comparison to the world: 187
40% (2009 est.)

Population below poverty line:
70% (2009 est.)

 

THEANTICLAUS

6:37 PM ET

January 21, 2011

Neoleft is Right...You Cannot Have it Both Ways

Israel wants two states, one Arab (which like all other Arab states except Lebanon will have Islam as its official religion) and one Jewish, called Israel (with rights for minorities enshrined in its laws). Unfortunately, HAMAS and the Palestinian Authority don't agree with you Neo. They insist on an Arab, Muslim-dominated state called Palestine AND another Muslim-dominated state in waht used to be Israel. it's called the Conquest of Stages, something the PA and HAMAS still speak of openly. They wish to set up a state as a precursor to the conquest of ALL the Mandatory Palestinian Territory later. Of course, they don't say what they want to do with Jordan, which accounted for 2/3 of Mandatory Palestine under the British. Thanks for this fine point Neo, old boy!

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:18 PM ET

January 21, 2011

No, It Does Not Make for a Massacre

Israel is regularly scrutinized under a microscope that seems reserved for it alone. Critics ignore how other countries, including Western democracies, have reacted to violent disturbances that are incomparably less threatening to them than those faced by Israel.

The UN itself provides at least one apt example: in 1993 UN peacekeeper forces in Somalia used helicopter gunships to mow down hostile civilians and militiamen. On September 9 for example, in one brief engagement, US Cobra helicopters defended a US bulldozer crew by firing anti-tank missiles and 20-mm cannon on a crowd of attacking Somali civilians and militiamen. The UN justified the killing of almost 100 Somalis by noting that, “Everyone on the ground in the vicinity was a combatant, because they meant to do us harm.” US soldiers referred to a “free fire zone” and complained that Somalis “call us killers of women and children when we shoot the very same people who are shooting at us and we kill some of the people that they are using for cover.”

Other examples that provide valuable perspective include the United States invasion of Panama, Jordan’s reaction to a PLO uprising, and Saudi Arabia’s reaction to riots by Iranian pilgrims in Mecca. In each case these countries acted with far less regard for the lives of their adversaries than Israel has in the present crisis.

Here's another useful comparison: US and UN in Somalia vs. Israeli use of force against the Palestinians:

There can be no doubt that Israel has been far more restrained in dealing with Palestinian attacks than the US and UN were in dealing with comparable Somalian attacks. Clearly, some of the battles in Somalia were far more intense than any in the recent fighting between Israelis and Palestinians. But this is largely because Israel has acted with great forbearance. Moreover, many of the battles in Somalia were quite similar to battles between Israelis and Palestinians.

The September 1993 battle, in particular is worth emphasizing, because it was a relatively small encounter, involving an armed band who were joined by civilians in attacking UN soldiers. The UN forces, including US Cobra helicopters, considered the area of the attack a “free fire zone” and shot at every Somali in the vicinity, whether armed or not. The Cobra’s 20-mm cannon and anti-tank missiles killed nearly 100 Somalis, many of them women and children. The words of UN Military spokesman Major David Stockwell bear repeating:

"Everyone on the ground in the vicinity was a combatant, because they meant to do us harm. (as quoted in the Manchester Guardian Weekly, September 19, 1993)."

The Somali death toll in this single small battle with UN forces equaled the entire Palestinian death toll in the first three weeks of the disturbances, once again demonstrating the great restraint exhibited by Israel.

It is also instructive to compare the reactions of the US and Israel to having soldiers – some of them wounded – trapped by an extremely hostile armed mob. When US soldiers were trapped by much larger Somali forces in the October battle mentioned above, the US rescued them at the cost of more than 500 Somali lives. When Israeli soldiers were under siege at Joseph's Tomb in Nablus, with Cpl. Yosef Madhat seriously wounded by gunfire, an Israeli request to Palestinian forces to allow his evacuation was refused. Senior IDF commanders ignored pleas from the trapped soldiers that the officer was dying, and did not employ nearby armored forces to effect a rescue, stating later that they wanted to avoid escalation and the attendant bad publicity:

"If we had sent in tanks and heavy weapons to take out a wounded soldier, it would not only have caused an escalation in events, but imagine how it would look to the rest of the world." (Jerusalem Post, October 3, 2000)

Instead, Israel protected Palestinian lives by not trying to extricate the wounded officer, who, after four hours, bled to death.

While the US defended the huge Somali death toll that resulted from the rescue of its trapped soldiers as not exceeding “what was necessary to counter this escalating fire and ... consistent with the right of self-defense under international law...”, Israel once again exercised far more restraint, but has nonetheless been charged with excessive use of force.

Moreover, the number of casualties in a conflict has absolutely NOTHING to do with which combatant is in the right or wrong. By your thinking (I cannot use the word "logic" with you), the British were war criminals for killing tens of thousands of German citizens in the bombing of Dresden in WWII. I suppose you also consider the US to be war criminals for killing or wounding over 100,000 people in the atomic bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, while NO US CIVILIAN LOSSES took place during those attacks? Numbers mean nothing in warfare as to the legality of the attack. Your arguments are specious.

 

THEANTICLAUS

8:47 PM ET

January 21, 2011

Does NeoLefty Condemn These Human Rights Violations?

Muslim World: Iran’s execution binge
By JONATHAN SPYER
21/01/2011

Since the brutal repression of nationwide dissent following the 2009 elections, authorities are now increasing their crackdown on Kurds.

In the early morning hours of Saturday, January 15 in the isolated and overcrowded Urumiya prison in western Iran, the authorities hanged one of their opponents.

Hossein Khazri, an alleged activist with the Party for Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK), was 29. He had been in custody since early 2009. His crime, of which he was convicted on July 11, 2009, was that of being an “enemy of God” in the eyes of the Islamic Republic.

Khazri’s specific activities against the deity worshiped by the rulers of Iran appear to have consisted of political agitation for democracy and federalism in the country of his birth.

In the course of his incarceration, in prisons administered by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps and the Intelligence Ministry, Khazri had been severely tortured, according to human rights organizations. His hanging was the latest in a wave of executions of Kurdish activists and other opponents of the regime carried out in recent weeks. Fourteen other Kurdish activists are currently on death row, condemned for their political activities.

The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran this week described the authorities as on an “execution binge,” orchestrated by the intelligence and security agencies.

The hanging of Khazri brings the number of people executed by Iran since the beginning of the year to 47.

A spokesman for ICHRI said that the “execution of Kurdish activists, without fair trials and following torture, increasingly appears as a systematic, politically motivated process.” The roundups and executions of Kurdish activists are part of an ongoing, brutal and little-reported war waged by the Revolutionary Guards against a separatist insurgency in the predominantly Kurdish areas of western Iran. Urumiya jail, which was built to house 150, is currently teeming with 300 inmates, as a result of recent crackdowns on independent political activity.

PJAK HAS been fighting the Iranian authorities since 2004. It defines its fight not in ethnic nationalist terms.

Rather, it claims to be fighting for “federalism and secular democracy” in Iran.

Based in the Qandil mountain range on the Iraqi border, the movement engages in periodic raids into Iran. Since February 2009, it has been designated a terrorist organization by the US. PJAK is an offshoot of the Turkish-Kurdish PKK, and belongs to the same umbrella organization.

It lacks the deep roots among the Kurds of Iran which the PKK possesses among the Turkish Kurds, however.

Unverified media reports have suggested that despite the terrorist designation, the group has received US support, as part of a larger effort to foment unrest and instability in Iran. There have also been rumors of Israeli contacts with the organization. These supposed Western links feature prominently in the propaganda of the Iranian authorities against PJAK.

But whatever the particular provenance of PJAK, it is clear that the people in whose name it wishes to speak, the Kurds of Iran, currently endure something much less than a free life. The movement’s potential for growth is thus considerable.

The repression of it by the regime is correspondingly harsh.

THE IRANIAN system is dominated by ethnic Persians, but the Islamic Republic does not define itself officially according to ethnic identity. Rather, it rules in the name of religion. As such, the regime constitutionally recognizes the Kurdish language. In practice, however, discrimination against Kurds and other minority ethnic and religious communities is widespread and of long standing.

Around 5 million Kurds live in Iran, concentrated in the provinces of West Azerbaijan, Ilam and Kurdistan. Separatist sentiment is particularly strong among Sunni Muslim Kurds, who constitute just over half the total. In the earliest days of the regime, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini declared a jihad against Kurdish separatism, and 10,000 Kurds were killed as the Revolutionary Guards fought to establish regime control in these areas.

After the unrest following the rigged presidential elections of July 2009, the Islamist authorities’ repression in Kurdish areas of the country has once more sharply increased. Last May, the authorities began a crackdown as the anniversary of the elections approached. Four Kurdish activists, one a woman, were convicted of membership in PJAK and executed following severe torture.

None was given access to lawyers. PJAK denied any links with the four. All were convicted, like Hossein Khazri, of the crime of war against God.

The incidents led to widespread demonstrations and further bloody suppression.

And this is where things remain. The period since the successful repression of the countrywide dissent that followed the elections of July 2009 has seen the consolidation of an Islamist counterreaction within the regime.

The power of the intelligence and security apparatuses has grown. This is reflecting itself in the brutal repression of dissent taking place in the Kurdishspeaking areas along the border with Iraq. Khazri was the latest victim of this repression. He was almost certainly not the last.

 

GAHGEER

12:26 PM ET

January 23, 2011

CIA facts?

Indeed pathetic. Another guy just posted them on a youTube video on how Gaza is flourishing under Israel's siege!

 

WIZARD44

6:47 PM ET

January 19, 2011

Central Asia

Hello Prof Walt,

Though I know geographically, Afpak is beyond the borders of the Middle East & thus not the suject of your post, I am curious what "vital strategic interest" might be at stake in that area of on-going strife.

Since a war to contain terrorists networks along the border between Afghanistan & Pakistan seems to be like a dog chasing its tail(my opinion), can we assume that United Sates is there for more than the usual reasons..i.e. inertia, the out-sized influence of the military, the natural impulse to avoid 'failure'.....etc....? Such interests might include the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and related materials.

I would be interested in your thoughts.

All the Best,
Will

 

MWSCHNEIDER

10:08 PM ET

January 19, 2011

Controlling events

Without going into Prof. Walt's specific comments on problems with our foreign policy, I think he is correct to spotlight the reporter's comment about not being able to "control" events. This kind of thinking, i.e., that we SHOULD be able to control events everywhere, is long-standing and pernicious, leading to the assumption that we always have to "do" something. Sometimes things happen and the assumption that we could stop them from happening has long poisoned our politics; for example, the idea that we "lost" China in the 40s led to the McCarthy period and an increasing militarization of the Cold War.

We are seeing something of this with respect to China, ie, that somehow we could or should stop their rise.

 

NEOLEFT

12:49 AM ET

January 20, 2011

I beg to differ Professor Walt

With regards to Lebanon and Iraq, the US can hardly claim the events were unexpected.

They may well have reached a point where they are beyond the US' ability to control, but in both cases, it was and is US intervention and meddling which has led to the present day situations.

The recent events in Lebanon are clearly s result of the US backing Hezbollah into a corner and hoping that Hezbollah make a false move. It turns out that they haven't and have kept their cool, a scenario that the US did not count on.

 

NEOLEFT

12:59 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Slippery slope

Professor Walt, you write that with regards to the oil producing states:

"We don't have to control it; we just need to make sure that nobody else does. "

This strikes me as the root of the problem. I heard Neal Ferguson give an explanation about how Empire can often creep up on a state even when not intended.

He used the example of China, who might buy the rights to a mineral mine somewhere in Africa. It decides it needs to ensure the supply is secured, so they position military resources there to protect the mine. Then they build an infrastructure that allows the mine to operate more efficiently, which in turn requires additional protection. It then bribes the local government to allow this to take place and so on.

I think ensuring nobody else controls the oil is just a dangerous. Even if Bin Laden were to take over the Saudi Oil fields, what use is the oil unless they sell it. Bin Laden himself has said, they cannot drink the stuff.

 

THEANTICLAUS

8:28 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Can't drink the stuff?

I truly wish he would try.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

5:30 AM ET

January 20, 2011

The difference you talk about

The difference you talk about is a profound as the difference between knowing something and knowing that you know something, in an epistemological way. We as undergrads were able to shred PhD level arguments on theories of knowledge. Or, put yet another way, any jack-ass can kick over a barn, though they can't build one.

 

PLEAB

10:55 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Simply withdraw

This desire to control is central to the exploitative and destructive nature of our economic system. The need to control leads inevitably to the need to expend resources to effect that control which further leads to the need for more control on so on.

At some point you have to break the cycle or you will destroy whatever power you had in the first place. This is what is happening to the US. Egged on by profiteers, the argument is made over and over: we can't withdraw or the world will descend into chaos and anarchy. Once you've made the decision that in order to preserve what you have, you must expend everything you have, you're on a downward trajectory with no hope of escape.

We have the escape the self imposed limitations on our own worldview. Otherwise, the decline cannot be stopped. Solutions to problems become the problems that limit the utility of our solutions. We confine ourselves to simply repeating the mistakes of the past.

I recognize that from a realist point of view, that doesn't terribly realistic but how else do we escape the circle? It will all fall apart anyway and we will have only dug ourselves into a deeper hole.

There are many resons to believe that the human animal is still more animal than rational and knowing. We are so successful that our success eventually creates pressures that cause the population to collapse. When it's about exploding rabbit populations in Australia, we seem to see it very clearly. Yet still we are unable to address identical behaviour in ourselves.

Let's just consider for a moment what would happened if we did withdraw all efforts to control and dominate the Middle East. Further consider that our withdrawal does indeed lead to war and instability and suddenly the Gulf oil supplies are cur off. Would that be a disaster any worse than the one we seem to be headed for?

I think it is plausible that after such a withdrawal, oil prices would explode and we would face a decade of very painful readjustment, we would be much better off. Think about it, if oil suddenly hit $250 a barrel, who would be hurt most? Would it be us? Or would it be China? I think it would be China and by a very large margin.

Why?

We have an abundance of resources and are unlikely to be unable to feed ourselves. China's economy would ground to a halt. We would adjust our energy use patterns and very quickly, North America would find itself with a surplus of domestic oil. China'a exports to the US would become not only impossibly expensive to produce, but even more expensive to transport. Ever see fruit from China at your local grocery store? How is that even feasible? How does the expenditure of resources necessary to bring a Chinese apple to the US make any sense in an environmental sense? It doesn't.

But now take it one step furher. China is basically kicking the crap out of the US economy because of an enormous supply of cheap labour. But there is another reason they're doing so well vis a vis the US.

Cheap oil.

Guess who subsidizes that cheap oil with more than half the world's military spending? Can you see my point?

We are subsidizing the rise of China at a back breaking cost. We live on an underpopulated and resource rich continent. We have so much access to inexpensive resources that in the medium to long term, we will be far better off than the average Chinese could ever hope to be. No nation on Earth can seriously threaten the land mass of the US and no nation ever will. It's an imposibility.

When all is said, we have to get rid of our corporatist Israel focused mindset. We will all be the winners.

Israel can decide if it wants to live in Peace with its neighbours or not. I suspect that faced with the naked reality of their circumstances, we could have the problem solved very quickly. Israel will not survive in the belly of a great, angry Eurasian beast on sand and rock.

Does anyone think that 5 million Jewish Israelis living side by side with several hundred million Arabs would be any less successful than 5 million Jews living side by side with several hundred million Americans?

It is only unrealistic because we are letting crimminals, thieves and liars define the questions, thereby defining the answers.

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:45 PM ET

January 21, 2011

Some of your arguments have merit...

...especially about the rapacious nature of humans overloading our planet--1.5 billion people a century ago and nearly 7 billion now! Also, we need to get off the oil teat. However, your comments about Jews surviving in Arab lands is not based on good facts. Five million plus Jews live in the USA and are full citizens here. They never were nor ever will be full citizens in Muslim lands...plain and simple. Non-Muslims are dhimmis, without full rights and subject to greater or lesser amounts of discrimiantion over time. The problem is Arab Muslim intolerance, not some so-called occupation or purported Israeli aggression. Keep in mind there is only an "occupation" today because of multiple Arab invasions of Israel, starting at its birth. If you believe peace will break out and everyone will join hands and sing cumbayah should Israel withdraw from the territories in question, then ask yourself why there was no peace prior to 1967.

 

CHARYBDIS

11:18 AM ET

January 20, 2011

'Controlling' the Middle East

As if this were not difficult as it is, there is a new problem coming up: Natural gas has been found in the Mediterranean Sea, off Israels coast but somewhat to the North, so a new dispute between Israel and Lebanon is bound to emerge. And these countries formally still are at war.

The gas has been found at large depth, the sea is about 5,000 meters deep and the gas well is about 1,700 meters below the bottom of the sea.

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:34 PM ET

January 20, 2011

IT MAY BE A SOURCE FOR COOPERATION, NOT CONFRONTATION

Egypt and Jordan have already formed international boundaries with Israel in teh Red Sea to allocate resources found there. Cyprus and Israel are currently negotiating the demarcation line. Under international law, this line is typically 200 miles from the coast of a sovereign nation. When a neighboring country is less than 400 miles across the sea, that line must be set somewhere in the middle, by negotiation. In the case of Cyprus and Israel, who are separated by apporximately 260 miles of sea, that will mean control of about 130 miles of seabed for commercial exploitation for both of them. Unfortunately, HAMAS, which controls Gaza, has not been cooperative. Egypt unilaterally drew its commercial boundary with that territory, adn Israel is in the process of doing the same, taking into account customary procedures for setting that boundary, which are based on land/sea boundary features such as bays, peninsulas, etc. As Lebanon's government is in disarray, and may very well descend once more into civil war due to Hizballah actions, Israel will likely have to take the same measures along the Lebanese border as they and the Egyptians did in Gaza. Too bad, cooperation would have made things easier and also benefitted Lebanon financially.

 

NEOLEFT

1:28 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Israel is itching for another war with Hezbollah

But the region is about to undergo a lot of change. A new government will soon emerge in Egypt and Jordan, none of which will be pro Western.

Hams can hardly be asked to cooperate when they are not even allowed to control their own waters, air or land.

Israel won't want to share anything with Lebanon either, though a new government will arise there soon enough.

 

THEANTICLAUS

6:22 PM ET

January 21, 2011

Neoleft's Crystal Ball

Boy, you really like to hear youself pontificate, dontcha? So, you predict Jordan and Egypt will soon fall. Exactly when oh wise oracle? A year, two years, next week? As for Lebanon, there will be no new government. Hizb Allah will simply complete the coup it already launched agaisnt the democrativ forces of Lebanon. It will solidify power by continuing to kill any political opposition. Only fools would revel in that outcome. Say goodbye to the remaining Christians in teh country. Also, the Druze will be attacked in the months to come as they will also be forced to cow tow to the new order arranged by Iran. As for your assertion about Israel not sharing any offshore resources with Israel, your bias again shows. Israel has made overtures to settle claims, but it is Lebanon that refuses to negotiate. They will not deal with what they describe as the "Zionist Entity." Clearly, the radical Muslims led by hizb Allah are already in charge in Lebanon.

 

CHARYBDIS

11:23 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Correction:

The sea is about 1,700 meters deep, and the gas well is situated some 5,000 - 6,000 meters below the bottom of the sea.

 

GKARAM

4:26 PM ET

January 20, 2011

UsS Hypocrisy

The hypocrisy that you speak of has been going on for close to 100 years. It all started with President Wilson and his concept of self determination that was supposed to apply to all people all over the world. To his credit president Wilson appointed the King-Crane commission that concluded in very clear terms that to support the right of Jewish colonialization of Palestine would be wrong and unjust. Yet the US Congress proceeded to support the Balfour declaration and later , to deny Faisal and the Arabs their rights and ultimately to help establish the state of Israel as if the Wilsonian principle of self determination is tp apply to all except the Arabs.

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

7:29 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Balfour

Balfour was vaguely antisemetic as were most educated non-jewish Europeans of the time. Their attitude towards Jews may be summed up in the phrase ‘the Jewish problem’ which implied extreme irritation rather than hate. The Balfour declaration was primarily an attempt to dispose of this problem by shunting it out of sight and out of mind; it was an imperialist attitude. Imperialism should have been allowed to die quietly after WWII but unfortunately the US decided otherwise and we live with the consequential chaos of that decision.

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:37 PM ET

January 21, 2011

MUSLIM REVISIONISM

The US has always been a friend to those who oppose colonialism, but Israel is not a colonial adventure. It is the realization of the legitimate nationalistic movement of the Jewish people who sought for nearly two thousand years to reestablish their own sovereignty. That is Zionism.

As for the Arab national rights, they were recognized in the League of Nations resolutions and in the Balfour Declaration. Also, the 1947 UN Partition Plan recognized Arab national rights. Too bad the Arabs refused to accept those terms because they felt it more important to deny Jews their rights rather to obtain their own national rights in a state next to israel. The Arabs made the same mistake in 1967 when they refused the generous offer Israel made to withdraw from all territories captured in that defensive war except for Jerusalem, which they did not want to see divided again. Instead, the Arab League in Khartoum gave their famous "Three Nos" response to Israel's overtures for peace--"no negotiation, no recognition and no peace with Israel!"

Stop blaming the US, Israel or anybody else for your own blind hatred and intransigence. By accepting responsibility for the past you may be able to move on and build a better future.

 

HOMOSAPIENS

5:50 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Why do you hedge?

Dear Prof Walt:
I am a fan of yours, BUT I cannot help why you hedge so often with fact qualifiers like "looks like", "seems, etc." For example, in this essay:

"We're hamstrung by the "special relationship" with Israel, which reduces our freedom of maneuvers, makes our rhetoric about justice and democracy and human rights look hypocritical, and angers millions of people around the Arab and Islamic world. We foolishly invaded Iraq and then bungled the job, which made us look both aggressive and incompetent. We continue to follow a failed policy toward Iran, which only seems to make Ahmadinejad stronger.

look hypocritical? The facts as you state ARE hypocritical. "look both aggressive and incompetent? Have you no opinion yourself of the reality of the agression and incompetence?

only seems to make Ahmadinejad stronger? You get the idea. IMHO, you take the punch out of your expression when you are so timid with your own opinions.

 

BUDAHH

6:39 PM ET

January 20, 2011

A good way to get some leverage back would be to allow for

the drilling of oil and natural gas in all of the continental U.S , a lot of the prices in the market are based on speculation, even if the U.S would announce that it is drilling for oil the prices would drop significantly,since the U.S imports so much of the oil in the world.
The drop of prices would give the U.S a lot more leverage and power, it would weaken russia, venezuela , Iran and our gulf buddies who's economies are based on oil sales, the economy would improve significantly, our trade deficit would decrease and it will create a whole lot of jobs, drilling in the third world is ok , but not in the U.S . that is hypocritical lets let the niger delta , the rain forest and the middle east ruin their environment "so claim the green people" , but it isn't ok to drill in the U.s because it would harm our environment.
Drilling in the U.S is a better way to keep the environment because we have the best technology to do it right and if anything goes wrong you know that we will clean it up, unlike some other places.

It is a win win win situation, we will have more of our money stay here, we would create jobs and save the economy and we would get more leverage over other oil exporting countries.

 

NEOLEFT

1:22 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Like the Gulf of Mexico Buddah?

"Drilling in the U.S is a better way to keep the environment because we have the best technology to do it right and if anything goes wrong you know that we will clean it up, unlike some other places."

There's a 1 inch layer of oil at the bottom of the ocean covering hundreds of square miles. Hundreds of resident s are sick. The tap water is toxic, fish are washing up dead by the thousands and the beaches are laden with tar.

Yeah, we showed the word how it's done alright.

 

BUDAHH

2:24 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Hey the oil has to come from somewhere, you drive don't you?

So unless you have a better idea that is what we need to do, and yes the U.S is cleaning it up, besides that the reason they were drilling so far away from shore and so deep is because they were not permitted to go near the mainland where it is a lot easier to get the oil and it is a lot less deep in the ocean so if anything would have happened it would've been easier to clean up.
i know you want to keep your terrorists friends rich but hey, america needs to get some energy independence, also how many spills happened in the past 10 years and how many rigs are there around the gulf of mexico?

There are an estimated 20 billion barrels that are waiting to be drilled, think about how much money that would save the economy, it would be the best stimulus anyone can give the U,S

 

THEANTICLAUS

7:27 PM ET

January 20, 2011

THE HAMAS CHARTER--NOT EXACTLY US DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

The Covenant of Hamas (The Islamic Resistance Movement) [1]
In the name of Allah the Merciful and the Compassionate Palestine, Muharram 1, 1409 A.H./August 18, 1988

In the name of Allah the Merciful and the Compassionate

"You are the best nation that has been brought out for mankind. You command good and forbid evil and believe in Allah. If only the people of the Book [i.e., Jews and Christians] had believed, it would have been well for them. Some of them believe, but most of them are iniquitous. They will never be able to do you serious harm, they will only be an annoyance. If they fight you, they will turn their backs and flee, and will not be succored. Humiliation is their lot wherever they may be, except where they are saved from it by a bond with Allah or by a bond with men. They incurred upon themselves Allah's wrath, and wretchedness is their lot, because they denied Allah's signs and wrongfully killed the prophets, and because they disobeyed and transgressed." (Koran, 3:110-112).

"Israel will exist, and will continue to exist, until Islam abolishes it, as it abolished that which was before it." [From the words of] The martyr, Imam Hasan al-Banna', Allah's mercy be upon him. [2]

"The Islamic world is burning, and each and every one of us must pour water, even if it be a little, to extinguish whatever he can extinguish, without waiting for others." [From the words of] Sheikh Amjad Al-Zahawi, Allah's mercy be upon him. [3]

In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate
Preamble
Praise be to Allah. We seek help from Him, we ask forgiveness from Him, we ask Him for guidance, and we rely on Him. Prayer and peace be upon Allah's messenger and upon his family and companions, and those who are loyal to him and spread his message and follow his sunna [the Prophet's custom]. Prayer and peace be forever upon them as long as heaven and earth exist.

Oh people, from the midst of great troubles and in the depths of suffering, and from the beating of believing hearts and arms purified for worship, out of cognizance of duty and in response to Allah's command - thence came the call [of our movement] and the meeting and joining [of forces], and thence came education in accordance with Allah's way and a resolute will to carry out [the movement's] role in life, overcoming all of the obstacles and surmounting the difficulties of the journey. Thence came also continuous preparation, [along with] readiness to sacrifice one's life and all that is valuable for the sake of Allah.

Then the seed took form and [the movement] began to move forward through this stormy sea of wishes and hopes, yearnings and aspirations, dangers and obstacles, pains and challenges, both locally [in Palestine] and abroad.

When the idea ripened, and the seed grew, and the plant shot its roots into the ground of reality, away from fleeting emotions and improper hastiness, then the Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas] [4] set out to play its role, marching onward for the sake of Allah. [In doing this, Hamas] joins arms with all those who wage jihad for the liberation of Palestine. [5] The souls of its jihad fighters meet the souls of all those jihad fighters who sacrificed their lives for the land of Palestine, from the time when the Prophet's companions conquered it until the present.

The covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) reveals its face, presents its identity, clarifies its stand, makes clear its aspiration, discusses its hopes, and calls out to help it and support it and to join its ranks, because our fight with the Jews is very extensive and very grave, and it requires all the sincere efforts. It is a step that must be followed by further steps; it is a brigade that must be reinforced by brigades upon brigades from this vast Islamic world, until the enemies are defeated and Allah's victory is revealed.

This is how we see them coming on the horizon: "And after a time you will come to know about it."(Koran, 38:88)
"Allah has written: It is I and My messengers who will surely prevail. Allah is Strong and Mighty." (Koran, 58:21)

"Say: This is my way. I call on Allah with certainty, I and those who follow me, and glory be to Allah, I am not among the polytheists." (Koran, 12:108)

Chapter I: Introduction to the Movement
Ideological Premises
Article One

The Islamic Resistance Movement: Islam is its way. It is from Islam that it derives its ideas, concepts, and perceptions concerning the universe, life, and man, and it refers to Islam's judgment in all its actions. It is from Islam that it seeks direction so as to guide its steps.

The Relation between the Islamic Resistance Movement and the Muslim Brotherhood
Article Two

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine. The Muslim Brotherhood movement is a global organization and is the largest of the Islamic movements in modern times. It is distinguished by its profound understanding and its conceptual precision and by the fact that it encompasses the totality of Islamic concepts in all aspects of life, in thought and in creed, in politics and in economics, in education and in social affairs, in judicial matters and in matters of government, in preaching and in teaching, in art and in communications, in secret and in the open, and in all other areas of life.
Structure and Formation
Article Three

The Islamic Resistance Movement is founded upon Muslims who gave their allegiance to Allah and served Him as He ought to be served. "I did not create jinns and men except that they should serve me." (Koran, 51:56)

[These Muslims] recognized their duty towards themselves, their families and their homeland, fearing Allah in all of this. They raised the banner of jihad in the face of the oppressors, in order to deliver the land and the believers from their filth, impurity and evil. "We hurl the truth against falsehood and crush its head, and lo, it vanishes." (Koran, 21:18)
Article Four

The Islamic Resistance Movement welcomes every Muslim who embraces its creed, adopts its ideology, is committed to its way, keeps its secrets and desires to join its ranks in order to carry out the duty, and his reward is with Allah.

The Islamic Resistance Movement - Dimensions of Time and Place
Article Five

The temporal dimension of the Islamic Resistance Movement - in view of the fact that it has adopted Islam as its way of life - go back to the birth of the Islamic message and to the righteous early believers; Allah is its goal, the Prophet is its example to be followed, and Koran is its constitution.

Its spatial dimension: wherever there are Muslims who embrace Islam as their way of life, everywhere upon the earth. Thus, [Hamas] sends its roots deep into the ground, and it extends to embrace the heavens.

"Do you not see how Allah has given us a parable? A good word is like a good tree; its roots are firm and its branches extend to the heavens. It always bears its fruit at the right time in accordance with God's will. Allah recites parables to men so that they will take heed." (Koran, 14:24-25)

Distinctiveness and Independence
Article Six
The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinct Palestinian movement that is loyal to Allah, adopts Islam as a way of life and works to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine. Under the wing of Islam, followers of other religions can all live safe and secure in their life, property and rights; whereas in the absence of Islam, discord arises, injustice spreads, corruption burgeons, and there are conflicts and wars. Allah bless the Muslim poet Muhammad Iqbal [6] who said:

When faith is gone, there is no safety,
And there is no life to him who has no religion.
He who is content to live without religion
Has taken death as a consort of life.

The Universality of the Islamic Resistance Movement
Article Seven
Muslims who adopt the way of the Islamic Resistance Movement are found in all countries of the world, and act to support [the movement], to adopt its positions and to reinforce its jihad. Therefore, it is a world movement, and it is qualified for this [role] owing to the clarity of its ideology, the loftiness of its purpose and the exaltedness of its goals. It is on this basis that it should be regarded and evaluated; it is on this basis that its role should be recognized. Whoever denies its rights, refrains from helping it, becomes blind [to the truth] and makes an effort to blot out its role - he is like one who attempts to dispute with [divine] predestination. Whoever closes his eyes to the facts, intentionally or unintentionally, will eventually wake up [to find that] events have overtaken him and that the [weight of the] evidence has rendered him unable to justify his position. Precedence shall be given to those who those who come first [to the movement]. The iniquity of one's own relatives is more painful to the soul than the blow of a sharp sword. [7]

"We have revealed to you the Book in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it and guarding it. Judge between them according to what Allah has revealed, and follow not their capricious will, turning away from the truth that was revealed to you. To each among you Allah has appointed a law and a way. If Allah had so desired, he would have made you a single nation. However, he desired to test you in all that he had given you. So vie with one another in good works. It is to Allah that you shall all return, and He will then reveal to you [the truth] about the matters in which you differed." (Koran 5:48)

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one link in the chain of jihad in confronting the Zionist invasion. It is connected and linked to the [courageous] uprising of the martyr 'Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam and his brethren the jihad fighters of the Muslim Brotherhood in the year 1936. It is further related and connected to another link, [namely] the jihad of the Palestinians, the efforts and jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1948 war, and the jihad operations of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1968 and afterwards. Although these links are far apart, and although the continuity of jihad was interrupted by obstacles placed in the path of the jihad fighters by those who circle in the orbit of Zionism, the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to realize the promise of Allah, no matter how long it takes. The Prophet, Allah's prayer and peace be upon him, says: "The hour of judgment shall not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them, so that the Jews hide behind trees and stones, and each tree and stone will say: 'Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him,' except for the Gharqad tree, for it is the tree of the Jews." (Recorded in the Hadith collections of Bukhari and Muslim).

The Motto of the Islamic Resistance Movement
Article Eight

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model to be followed, the Koran its constitution, Jihad its way, and death for the sake of Allah its loftiest desire.

Chapter II: Goals
Causes and Goals
Article Nine

The Islamic Resistance Movement has found itself in a period when Islam is absent from everyday life. Consequently, the balance has been disturbed, concepts have been confused, values have been altered, evil people have come into power, injustice and darkness have prevailed, the cowardly have become tigers, the homeland has been ravished, the people have been driven away and have been wandering in all the countries of the world. The rule of righteousness is absent, and the rule of falsehood prevails. Nothing is in its proper place. Thus, when Islam is absent, everything is transformed. These are the causes.

As for the goals, they are to fight falsehood, vanquish it and defeat it so that righteousness shall rule, the homeland shall return [to its rightful owner], and from the top of its mosques, the [Muslim] call for prayer will ring out announcing the rise of the rule of Islam, so that people and things shall all return to their proper place. From Allah we seek succor.

"If Allah did not ward off one group of people by means of another, the earth would certainly be in a state of disorder. Allah is most kind to all beings." (Koran, 2:251)

Article Ten

The Islamic Resistance Movement - while marching forward - offers support to all who are persecuted and protects all who are oppressed with all its strength. It spares no effort in upholding the truth and eradicating falsehood, in word and in action, here and in every place within its reach and its influence.

PART III: Strategy and Means
The Strategy of the Islamic Resistance Movement
Palestine Is an Islamic Waqf [i.e., an Islamic religious endowment]
Article Eleven

The Islamic Resistance Movement maintains that the land of Palestine is Waqf land given as endowment for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection. One should not neglect it or [even] a part of it, nor should one relinquish it or [even] a part of it. No Arab state, or [even] all of the Arab states [together], have [the right] to do this; no king or president has this right nor all the kings and presidents together; no organization, or all the organizations together - be they Palestinian or Arab - [have the right to do this] because Palestine is Islamic Waqf land given to all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection.
This is the legal status of the land of Palestine according to Islamic law. In this respect, it is like any other land that the Muslims have conquered by force, because the Muslims consecrated it at the time of the conquest as religious endowment for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection. This is how it was: when the conquest of Al-Sha'm [8] and Iraq was complete, the commanders of the Muslim armies sent messages to the Caliph 'Umar b. Al-Khattab, asking for instructions concerning the conquered land - should they divide it up among the troops or leave it in the hands of its owners or what?

After discussions and consultations between the Caliph 'Umar b. Al-Khattab and the Companions of the Prophet, they decided that the land should be left with its [original] owners to benefit from its crops, but the substance of the land, that is the land itself, should constitute Waqf for all the generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection. The tenure of the owners is only tenure of usufruct. This Waqf will exist as long as the heaven and earth exist. Any measure which does not conform to this Islamic law regarding Palestine is null and void. "This surely is the very truth. Therefore, praise the great name of your Lord." (Koran, 56:95-96)

Homeland and Nationalism as Seen by the Islamic Resistance Movement
Article Twelve
Nationalism [9], as seen by the Islamic Resistance Movement, is part of the [Islamic] religious creed. There is nothing that speaks more eloquently and more profoundly of nationalism than the following: when the enemy tramples Muslim territory, waging jihad and confronting the enemy become a personal duty of every Muslim man and Muslim woman. A woman may go out to fight the enemy [even] without her husband's permission and a slave without his master's permission.

There is nothing like this in any other political system - this is an indisputable fact. Whereas the various other nationalist [ideologies] are connected to physical, human and regional factors, the nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is [likewise] characterized by all of the above, and in addition - and most importantly - it is characterized by divine motives which endow it with spirit and life, since it is related to the source of the spirit, and to Him who gives life. [The Islamic Resistance Movement] is raising the divine banner in the skies of the homeland, so as to firmly connect heaven and earth.

When Moses came and cast down his rod
Both sorcery and sorcerer came to naught
"The right way stands out clearly from error; therefore, whoever renounces falsehood and believes in Allah, he has indeed grasped the firmest handhold, which never breaks, and Allah is Hearing and Knowing." (Koran, 2:256)

Peaceful Solutions, Initiatives and International Conferences
Article Thirteen
The initiatives, the so-called peace solutions, and the international conferences for resolving the Palestinian problem stand in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement, for to neglect any part of Palestine is to neglect part of the Islamic faith. The nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its [Islamic] faith. It is in the light of this principle that its members are educated, and they wage jihad in order to raise the banner of Allah over the homeland.

"And Allah has full control over His affairs; but most people do not know." (Koran, 12:21)

From time to time there are calls to hold an international conference in order to seek a solution for the [Palestinian] problem. Some accept this [proposal] and some reject it, for one reason or another, demanding the fulfillment of some condition or conditions before they agree to hold the conference and participate in it. However, the Islamic Resistance Movement - since it is familiar with the parties participating in the conference and with their past and current positions on the issues of the Muslims - does not believe that these conferences can meet the demands or restore the rights [of the Palestinians], or bring equity to the oppressed. These conferences are nothing but a way to give the infidels power of arbitration over Muslim land, and when have the infidels ever been equitable towards the believers?

"The Jews will never be content with you, nor will the Christians, until you follow their religion. Say: 'The guidance of Allah is the right guidance.' But if you follow their desires after the knowledge which has come to you, then you shall have no protector or guardian from Allah." (Koran, 2:120)

There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are a waste of time and a farce. The Palestinian people is far too eminent to have its future, its rights and its destiny toyed with. As stated in the Hadith: "The people of Al-Sha'm are [Allah's] rod in His land. Through them, He wreaks vengeance on whomever He wishes among His servants. The hypocrites among them are not allowed to be superior to the believers among them, and they shall die in grief and distress." (Recorded by Al-Tabarani with a chain of transmitters to Muhammad, and by Ahmad [Ibn Hanbal] with an incomplete chain of transmitters to Muhammad which may be the accurate record, the transmitters in both cases being trustworthy - Allah alone is omniscient).

The Three Circles
Article Fourteen
The problem of the liberation of Palestine relates to three circles: the Palestinian, the Arab and the Islamic. Each one of these circles has a role to play in the struggle against Zionism and it has duties to fulfill. It would be an enormous mistake and an abysmal act of ignorance to disregard anyone of these circles. For Palestine is an Islamic land where the First Qibla(29) and the third holiest site(30) are located. That is also the place whence the Prophet, be Allah's prayer and peace upon him, ascended to Heavens(31).

"Glorified be He who carried His servant by night from the Inviolable Place of worship(32) to the Far Distant Place of Worship(33), the neighborhood whereof we have blessed, that we might show him of our tokens! Lo! He, only He, is the Hearer, the Seer." Sura XVII (al-Isra,)(34), verse 1.

In consequence of this state of affairs, the liberation of that land is an individual duty binding on all Muslims everywhere(35). This is the base on which all Muslims have to regard the problem; this has to be understood by all Muslims. When the problem is dealt with on this basis, where the full potential of the three circles is mobilized, then the current circumstances will change and the day of liberation will come closer.

"You are more awful as a fear in their bosoms than Allah. That is because they are a folk who understand not." Sura LIX, (Al-Hashr, the Exile), verse 13.

Jihad for the Liberation of Palestine is a Personal Duty
Article Fifteen
The day the enemies conquer some part of the Muslim land, jihad becomes a personal duty of every Muslim. In the face of the Jewish occupation of Palestine, it is necessary to raise the banner of jihad. This requires the propagation of Islamic consciousness among the masses, locally [in Palestine], in the Arab world and in the Islamic world. It is necessary to instill the spirit of jihad in the nation, engage the enemies and join the ranks of the jihad fighters.

The indoctrination campaign must involve ulama, educators, teachers and information and media experts, as well as all intellectuals, especially the young people and the sheikhs of Islamic movements. It is [also] necessary to introduce essential changes in the curricula, in order to eliminate the influences of the intellectual invasion which were inflicted upon them by the Orientalists and the missionaries. This invasion came upon the region after Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi defeated the Crusaders. The Crusaders then realized that it is impossible to vanquish the Muslims unless the way is first paved by an intellectual invasion that would confuse the [Muslims'] thinking, distort their legacy and impugn their ideals. Only after this [intellectual invasion] would there come invasion with troops. This [intellectual invasion] prepared the ground for the colonialist invasion, as [General] Allenby declared upon entering Jerusalem: "Now the Crusades have come to an end." General Gouraud stood at Salah Al-Din's tomb, and said: "Oh, Salah Al-Din, we are back!" Colonialism helped to intensify the intellectual invasion and helped it to take root. It still does. All this paved the way towards the loss of Palestine.

It is necessary to establish in the minds of all the Muslim generations that the Palestinian issue is a religious issue, and that it must be dealt with as such, for [Palestine] contains Islamic holy places, [namely] the Al-Aqsa mosque, which is inseparably connected, for as long as heaven and earth shall endure, to the holy mosque of Mecca through the Prophet's nocturnal journey [from the mosque of Mecca to the Al-Aqsa mosque] and through his ascension to heaven thence.

"Being stationed on the frontier for the sake of Allah for one day is better than this [entire] world and everything in it; and the place taken up in paradise by the [horseman's] whip of any one of you [jihad fighters] is better than this [entire] world and everything in it. Every evening [operation] and morning [operation] performed by Muslims for the sake of Allah is better than this [entire] world and everything in it." (Recorded in the Hadith collections of Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi and Ibn Maja)

"By the name of Him who holds Muhammad's soul in His hand, I wish to launch an attack for the sake of Allah and be killed and attack again and be killed and attack again and be killed." (Recorded in the Hadith collections of Bukhari and Muslim)

Educating the Next Generations
Article Sixteen
It is necessary to educate the next Islamic generations in our region in an Islamic way, based on the performance of the religious duties, attentive study of Allah's book, study of the Prophet's sunna [custom], perusal of Islamic history and legacy based on reliable sources under the instruction of experts and scholars, and reliance on methods which will produce a wholesome outlook in thought and in faith. In addition, it is necessary to closely study the enemy and his material and human capabilities, to become familiar with his weaknesses and strengths, to recognize the powers that assist and support him. It is also necessary to be familiar with current events, follow new developments and study the analyses and commentaries regarding them. It is likewise necessary to plan for the future and to study each and every phenomenon, so that Muslims engaged in jihad will live with full awareness of their purpose, goal and way, and [with full awareness of] what is happening around them.

"Oh my son! If [a thing] is but the weight of a grain of mustard, though it be in a rock, or in the heavens, or on earth, Allah will bring it forth. Allah discerns even the smallest thing; He is omniscient. Oh my son! Keep up prayer and enjoin the good and forbid the evil, and persevere whatever may befall you; surely this [behavior] is worthy steadfastness. Turn not thy cheek in scorn away from people; do not walk haughtily in the land. Allah does not love the arrogant and self-conceited." (Koran, 31:16-18)

The Role of Muslim Women
Article Seventeen

The role of the Muslim woman in the war of liberation is no less important than that of the man, for she is the maker of men. Her role in guiding and educating the next generation is very important. The enemies have realized [the significance of] her role, and they believe that if they can educate her according to their wishes, guiding her away from Islam, they will have won the war. You find, therefore, that they continually make great efforts [to do this] by means of the media, the cinema and school curricula, through their agents who are incorporated in Zionist organizations that assume various names and forms such as the Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, espionage groups, etc. - all of which are dens of sabotage and saboteurs. These Zionist organizations have an enormous abundance of material resources, which enable them to play their game in [various] societies with the aim of realizing their purpose while Islam is absent from the scene and the Muslims are estranged [from their faith]. The followers of the Islamic movements [10] should fulfill their role in countering the schemes of these saboteurs. When Islam is at the helm, it will totally eradicate these organizations, which are hostile to humanity and to Islam.

Article Eighteen

The woman in the jihadist home and family, as mother or sister, has the primary role in managing the household, raising the children according to the moral ideas and values inspired by Islam, and teaching them to perform the religious duties in preparation for the jihadist role that awaits them. Hence, it is necessary to pay close attention to the schools in which the Muslim girl is educated, and to their curricula, so that she will grow to be a good mother, conscious of her role in the war of liberation. She should have adequate awareness and understanding concerning the management of domestic affairs, since economy and avoiding wastefulness in family expenses are among the requirements in the ability to persist in the current difficult circumstances. She should ever be aware that available funds are like blood that must flow only in the veins for life to continue in both young and old.

"Muslim men and Muslim women, the believing men and women, the truthful men and women, the persevering men and women, the humble men and women, the charitable men and women, the fasting men and women, the men and women who guard their chastity, and the men and women who remember Allah frequently - for them Allah has prepared forgiveness and great reward." (Koran, 33:35).

The Role of Islamic Art in the War of Liberation
Article Nineteen
Art has rules and standards by which it is possible to determine whether it is Islamic or pagan. The Islamic liberation is in need of Islamic art that uplifts the spirit without subjecting one aspect of human nature to another, but rather uplifts all aspects in [perfect] balance and harmony. Man is a marvelous and unique creature made from a handful of clay and a breath of spirit. Islamic art addresses man on this basis, while pagan art addresses the physical body and gives dominance to the component of clay.

Books, articles, pamphlets, sermons, epistles, traditional songs, poems, [patriotic] songs, plays, etc. - when they have the characteristics of Islamic art, they are among the necessary means of ideological indoctrination. [They constitute] self-renewing sustenance for continuing the journey and refreshing the spirit, for the road is long, the suffering is great and the souls grow weary. Islamic art renews the energies, revives motion and awakens the soul to lofty ideals and wholesome conduct.

Nothing heals the soul when it is in retreat save moving from mode to mode.

All this is utterly serious and no jest, for the nation engaged in jihad knows no jest.

Social Solidarity
Article Twenty
Muslim society is characterized by solidarity. The Prophet, Allah's prayer and peace be upon him, says: "Blessed are the Banu Al-Ash'ar tribe. When they are afflicted with drought - whether in a town or on a journey - they would collect all that they have and divide it among themselves in equal shares." This is the Islamic spirit that should prevail in every Muslim society. A society which is facing a wicked enemy with Nazi behavior, that does not distinguish between men and women, old and young, has an even greater need to grace itself with this Islamic spirit [of solidarity]. Our enemy employs the method of collective punishment, depriving people of their homes and possessions. He pursued them [even] in their places of exile, breaking bones, shooting women, children and elderly people with or without reason. He established detention camps to imprison thousands and thousands [of people] in inhuman conditions, all this in addition to destroying houses, orphaning children and unjustly convicting thousands of young people to spend the best years of their youth in the darkness of prison. The Nazism of the Jews targeted both women and children. The terror they spread is directed at everyone. They fight people by destroying their livelihood, stealing their money and trampling their dignity. Their horrible treatment of people is like that of the worst war criminals. Deportation from one's homeland is a form of murder. In the face of such behavior, we must have social solidarity among the people, and we must face the enemy as one body, which, when one of its limbs is in pain, the rest of it reacts with sleeplessness and fever.

Article Twenty One

Social solidarity means offering help to everyone who is in need, be it material or moral, or joining with him to complete some work. Members of the Islamic Resistance Movement should regard the interests of the masses as their own, and they should spare no effort to achieve them and protect them. They must prevent reckless playing with matters affecting the future of the next generations or causing losses to their society. The masses are of them and for them, and the strength of the masses is strength for them; their future is theirs. The members of the Islamic Resistance Movement should be with the people on joyous occasions and at times of grief. They should espouse the demands of the masses and strive to serve the masses' interests, which are indeed their own. When this spirit prevails, friendship will deepen and there will be cooperation and empathy, unity will increase and the ranks will be strengthened to confront the enemies.

The Forces which Support the Enemy
Article Twenty Two
The enemies have been planning expertly and thoroughly for a long time in order to achieve what they have achieved, employing those means which affect the course of events. They strove to accumulate huge financial resources which they used to realize their dream.

With money they have taken control of the world media - news agencies, the press, publishing houses, broadcasting services, etc. With money they sparked revolutions in various countries around the world in order to serve their interests and to reap profits. They were behind the French Revolution and the Communist Revolution and [they are behind] most of the revolutions about which we hear from time to time here and there. With money they have formed secret organizations, all over the world, in order to destroy [those countries'] societies and to serve the Zionists' interests, such as the Freemasons, the Rotary Clubs, the Lions, the Sons of the Covenant [i.e. B'nei B'rith], etc. All of these are organizations of espionage and sabotage. With money they were able to take control of the colonialist countries, and [they] urged them to colonize many countries so that they could exploit their resources and spread moral corruption there.

There is no end to what can be said about [their involvement in] local wars and world wars. They were behind World War I, through which they achieved the destruction of the Islamic Caliphate, reaped material profits, took control of numerous resources, obtained the Balfour Declaration, and established the League of the United Nations [sic] so as to rule the world through this organization. They were [also] behind World War II, through which they reaped enormous profits from commerce in war materials and paved the way for the establishment of their state. They [also] suggested the formation of the United Nations and the Security Council to replace the League of the United Nations [sic] and to rule the world through this [new organization]. Wherever there is war in the world, it is they who are pulling the strings behind the scenes. "Whenever they ignite the fire of war, Allah extinguishes it. They strive to spread evil in the land, but Allah does not love those who do evil." (Koran, 5:64)

The colonialist powers, both in the capitalist West and the communist East, support the enemy with all their might, both materially and with manpower, alternating one with the other [in giving support]. When Islam appears, all the forces of unbelief unite to oppose it, for all unbelief is one denomination.

"Oh you who believe, do not take as your intimate friends those outside your ranks, for they will spare no effort to harm you. They desire that which causes you suffering. Hatred has indeed come out of their mouths, but what they hide in their hearts is even worse. We have given you clear signs, if you understand" (Koran, 3:118). It is not for nothing that the verse ends with His words "if you understand."

Chapter IV: Our Positions On:
A. The Islamic Movements
Article Twenty Three
The Islamic Resistance Movement looks on the other Islamic movements with respect and appreciation, for even if it is at variance with them in some given respect or thought, it agrees with them in many more respects or thoughts, and it views them - so long as their intentions are good and they are devoted to Allah - as falling under the rubric of legitimate opinion, that is, as long as their actions are within the bounds of the Islamic circle. Everyone who strives for truth receives his reward.

The Islamic Resistance Movement considers these movements as reinforcing it, and asks [Allah] to guide and direct us all. It never forgets to constantly raise the banner of unity and to strive assiduously to achieve unity in accordance with the Koran and the sunna. "Hold fast to Allah's rope, all of you. Do not be divided among yourselves, and remember Allah's favor to you. When you were enemies to one another, He brought your hearts together, and through his favor you became brothers. You were on the brink of a pit of fire, and He saved you from it. Thus Allah shows you His signs, so that you may follow the right way." (Koran, 3:103) [11]

Article Twenty Four

The Islamic Resistance Movement does not allow to impugn or to blacken the name of individuals or groups, for [true] Muslims do not impugn or curse others. One should make a clear distinction between this and positions or behavior, for the Islamic Resistance Movement does have the right to expose error and to deter people from it and to strive to make the truth known and to adopt it in an impartial way in every given case. Wisdom is what the Muslim looks for, and he takes it wherever he finds it. [12]

"Allah does not like it when people speak ill in public, except for those who have been wronged. Allah hears all and knows all. When you do good openly, or in secret, or forgive a wrong [done to you], surely Allah is Forgiving and Almighty." (Koran, 4:148-149)

B. The Nationalist Movements in the Palestinian Arena
Article Twenty Five
[The Islamic Resistance Movement] respects them and appreciates the conditions that surround and affect them. It supports them as long as they do not pay allegiance to the Communist East or to the Crusader West, and it emphasizes to all the members and supporters [of these movements] that it is a jihadist, ethical movement, conscientious in its worldview and in its treatment of others. It abhors opportunism, wants only good for the people, both as individuals and as groups, and does not strive to attain material gain or fame for itself. It does not seek reward from people, and it goes forth with its own resources and what it has at hand - "Muster against them all the force you can" (Koran, 8:60) - in order to carry out the duty and win Allah's favor. It has no desire other than that.

It reassures all the nationalist [groups] of all orientations that are operating in the Palestinian arena for the liberation of Palestine that it shall never be anything other than a support and an aid for them, in word and in deed, at present and in the future. It joins together and does not separate, preserves and does not scatter, unites and does not divide, it values every kind word, every sincere effort and every praiseworthy endeavor. It closes the door in the face of petty disagreements. It pays no heed to rumors and biased remarks, but is fully aware of [its] right to defend itself.

Anything that opposes or contradicts this orientation is fabricated by the enemy or by their lackeys in order to cause confusion, divide the ranks and create distraction with side issues. "OH you who believe, if an evildoer brings you information [about any person], you should examine it carefully lest you hurt [innocent] people out of ignorance, and afterwards come to regret it." (Koran, 49:6)

Article Twenty Six

The Islamic Resistance Movement - looking favorably as it does on the Palestinian nationalist movements - does not refrain from discussing new developments concerning the Palestinian problem in the local and international arena in an objective manner, so as to find to what extent [these developments] agree or disagree with the national interests in the light of the Islamic vision.

C. The Palestine Liberation Organization
Article Twenty Seven
The Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] is closest to the heart of the Islamic Resistance Movement. [We regard it as] a father, brother or friend, and a true Muslim does not spurn his father, his brother or his friend. Our homeland is one, our misfortune is one, our destiny is one and we share the same enemy.

Owing to the circumstances that surrounded the establishment of the PLO, and [owing to] the intellectual confusion which prevails in the Arab world as a result of the intellectual invasion to which it has been subject since the defeat of the Crusaders, and which was intensified, and continues to be intensified by Orientalism and Christian missionary activities - the PLO has adopted the idea of the secular state, and we view [the PLO] accordingly. Secularist ideology stands in total contradiction to the religious ideology, and it is ideas which are the basis of positions, behavior and decisions.

Hence, with all our appreciation for the Palestine Liberation Organization and what it may yet become, and without belittling its role in the Arab-Israeli conflict, we cannot give up the Islamic identity of Palestine in the present and in the future to adopt the secularist ideology - for the Islamic identity of Palestine is part of our faith, and whoever is lax with his faith is lost. "Who spurns the religion of Abraham but one who has made himself into a fool?" (Koran, 2:130)

When the PLO adopts Islam as its way of life, then we shall be its troops and the fuel for its fire that will burn the enemies. But until this time comes - and we pray to Allah that it be soon - the position of the Islamic Resistance Movement vis a vis the PLO is that of a son towards his father, a brother towards his brother or a relative towards his relative. He shares the other's pain when he is pricked by a thorn, and supports him in facing the enemy, and he wishes for him to find divine guidance and [follow] the right path.

Your brother, your brother before all others! He who has no brother
Is like one who goes to war unarmed.
Your cousin, you must know the strength of his wing,
For how can the falcon rise up without wings? [13]

D. Arab and Islamic States and Governments
Article Twenty-Eight
The Zionist invasion is a cruel invasion, which has no scruples whatsoever; it uses every vicious and vile method to achieve its goals. In its infiltration and espionage operations, it greatly relies on secret organizations which grew out of it, such as the Freemasons, the Rotary Clubs, the Lions and other such espionage groups. All these organizations, covert or overt, work for the interests of Zionism and under its direction, and their aim is to break societies, undermine values, destroy people's honor, create moral degeneration and annihilate Islam. [Zionism] is behind all types of trafficking in drugs and alcohol, so as to make it easier for it to take control and expand.

We demand that the Arab countries around Israel open their borders to jihad fighters from among the Arab and Islamic peoples, so they may fulfill their role and join their efforts to the efforts of their brothers - the Muslim brethren in Palestine. As for the rest of the Arab and Muslim countries, we demand that they facilitate the passage of the jihad fighters into them and out of them - that is the very least [they can do].

We should not fail to remind every Muslim that when the Jews occupied the Sacred place [i.e., Jerusalem] in 1967 and stood on the threshold of the blessed Al-Aqsa mosque, they shouted: "Muhammad is dead; his offspring are women." Israel with its Jewish identity and Jewish people is challenging Islam and the Muslims. May the cowardly know no sleep.

E. Nationalist and Religious Groups and Organizations, Intellectuals, and the Arab and Islamic world
Article Twenty Nine
The Islamic Resistance Movement hopes that these groups will stand by it in every respect, help it, espouse its positions, back its activities and strive to enlist support for it, so that the Muslim peoples will be a support and a reinforcement for it, and [will provide] strategic depth on all levels: [in terms of] human and material resources, information, in every time and every place. [This should be done] by holding conferences, publishing ideological pamphlets, and by indoctrination of the masses with regards to the Palestinian issue - what is facing [the Palestinians] and what is plotted against [them]. [Likewise they should work to] mobilize the Islamic peoples, ideologically, educationally and culturally, so that they will play their role in the decisive war of liberation just as they did in defeating the Crusaders and routing out the Mongols, thus saving human civilization. This is not difficult for Allah.

"Allah has decreed: 'I and My messengers shall prevail'; Allah is strong and all-powerful." (Koran, 58:21)

Article Thirty

Writers, intellectuals, media people, preachers in mosques, educators and all the various sectors in the Arab and Islamic world, are all required to fulfill their role and perform their duty. [This is necessary] due to the ferocity of the Zionist onslaught and the fact that it has infiltrated many countries and has taken control of the finances and media - with all the ramifications that follow from this - in most countries of the world.

Jihad is not limited to wielding arms and fighting the enemies face to face, for eloquent speech, persuasive writing, effective books, support and help - when [they are] performed with the sincere intention that Allah's banner will reign supreme - all constitute jihad for the sake of Allah.

[As the prophet said:] "Whoever equips a warrior fighting for the sake of Allah is [himself] a warrior, and whoever supports the family of a warrior [who has set out to fight for the sake of Allah] is [himself] a warrior." (Recorded by Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Da'ud and Tirmidhi in their Hadith collections).

F. Followers of other Religions
The Islamic Resistance Movement is a Humane Movement
Article Thirty One
The Islamic Resistance Movement is a humane movement which respects human rights and is committed to the Islamic tolerance towards the followers of the other religions. It is hostile only to those among them who display hostility towards it or stand in its way, hampering its activities and foiling its efforts. Under the wing of Islam, the followers of the three religions - Islam, Christianity and Judaism - can co-exist in security and safety. It is only under the wing of Islam that safety and security prevail. Recent and ancient history provide the best evidence for this. The followers of the other religions should stop competing with Islam for sovereignty in this region, because, when they rule, there is nothing but carnage, torture and deportation, and they cannot get along with their own, let alone with followers of other religions. Both the present and the past are full of evidence for this.

"They do not fight you together, except from within fortified villages, or from behind walls. They fight fiercely with one another. You consider them to be united, but their hearts are divided, for they are a people with no sense." (Koran, 59:14)

Islam accords to every person his rights, and prevents any infringement on other people's rights. The Nazi Zionist measures against our people will not succeed in prolonging the duration of their invasion, for the rule of injustice lasts but one hour, while the rule of the truth will last until the Hour of Resurrection.

"Allah does not forbid you to show kindness and act justly towards those who do not fight you on account of your religion, and do not drive you from your homes. Allah loves those who act justly." (Koran, 60:8)

G. The Attempt to Isolate the Palestinian People
Article Thirty Two
World Zionism and the colonialist powers attempt, by clever maneuvering and meticulous planning, to pull the Arab states, one by one, out of the circle of the conflict with Zionism, so as to ultimately isolate the Palestinian people. It has already taken Egypt out of the circle of conflict to a large extent through the treacherous Camp David Accords [of September 1978], and it is trying to pull additional [Arab] countries into similar agreements so that they leave the circle of conflict.

The Islamic Resistance Movement calls upon all the Arab and Muslim peoples to strive seriously and diligently to prevent this horrible scheme, and to alert the masses to the danger inherent in leaving the circle of the conflict with Zionism. Today it is Palestine, and tomorrow some other country or countries, for the Zionist plan has no limits, and after Palestine they want to expand [their territory] from the Nile to the Euphrates, and when they finish devouring one area, they hunger for further expansion and so on, indefinitely. Their plan is expounded in TheProtocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present [behavior] is the best proof for what we are saying.

Leaving the circle of the conflict with Zionism is an act of high treason; all those who do this shall be cursed. "Whoever [when fighting the infidels] turns his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intending to join another [fighting] company, he incurs Allah's wrath, and his abode shall be hell. Most unfortunate is his fate." (Koran, 8:16)

All forces and capabilities must be pooled to confront this ferocious Mongol, Nazi onslaught, lest homelands be lost, people be exiled, evil spread on the earth and all religious values be destroyed. Each and every person should know that he is responsible to Allah.

"Anyone who does a grain's weight of good shall see it, and anyone who does a grain's weight of evil shall see it." (Koran, 99:7-8)

In the circle of the conflict against world Zionism, the Islamic Resistance Movement sees itself as a spearhead or as a step forward on the road [to victory]. It joins its efforts to the efforts of all those who are active in the Palestinian arena. It now remains for steps to be taken by the Arab and Islamic world. [The Islamic Resistance Movement] is well qualified for the upcoming stage [of the struggle] with the Jews, the warmongers.

"We have planted enmity and hatred among them [i.e., among the Jews] until the Day of Resurrection. Every time they kindle the fire of war, Allah extinguishes it. They strive to spread evil upon the earth, and Allah does not love those who do evil." (Koran, 5:64)

Article Thirty Three

The Islamic Resistance Movement - proceeding from these general concepts which are in harmony and agreement with the laws of nature, and following the current of divine destiny towards confrontation with the enemies and jihad against them in defense of Muslims, Islamic civilization and Islamic sanctities, primarily the Al-Aqsa mosque - calls on the Arab and Islamic peoples and their governments, and on their NGOs and official organizations, to fear Allah in their attitude toward the Islamic Resistance Movement and in their treatment of it. They should act towards it as Allah wants them to, namely back it, support it, assist it and continuously reinforce it, until Allah's word is fulfilled. Then the ranks will all be united, jihad fighters will join other jihad fighters, and the masses all over the Islamic world will rush out and answer the call of duty, shouting: "Hasten to jihad!" This call will penetrate the clouds in the sky and continue to ring out, until liberation is accomplished, the invaders are defeated and Allah's victory is revealed.

"Allah surely helps whoever helps Him; Allah is strong and mighty." (Koran, 22:40)

Chapter Five: Historical Evidence throughout the Generations regarding Confrontation with Aggressors
Article Thirty Four

Palestine is the center of the Earth and the meeting place of the continents; it has always been the target of greedy aggressors. This has been the case since the dawn of history. The Prophet, Allah's prayer and peace be upon him, points to this in his noble words with which he addressed his exalted companion, Mu'adh b. Jabal, saying: "Oh Mu'adh, Allah will give you the land of Al-Sha'm after my death, from Al-'Arish to the Euphrates. Its men, women and handmaids will be [constantly] stationed on the frontier until the Day of Resurrection, for any one of you who chooses [to live in] some part of the coastal plains of Al-Sha'm or Bayt Al-Maqdis [i.e., Palestine], will be in a [constant] state of jihad until the Day of Resurrection."

The aggressors coveted Palestine on many occasions. They attacked it with great armies in attempt to realize their greedy aspirations. The great armies of the Crusaders came there, bringing their religious creed and hoisting their cross. They managed to defeat the Muslims for a while, and the Muslims only managed to regain it when they fought under their religious banner, joined forces crying "Allah Akbar," and set forth in jihad under the command of Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi for nearly two decades, which led to a clear victory: the Crusaders were defeated and Palestine was liberated.

"Say to the unbelievers: You will surely be defeated and gathered in Hell. Most terrible shall be your resting-place." (Koran, 3:12)

This is the only way to liberation, and one cannot doubt the testimony of history. This is one of the rules of the universe and the laws of reality. Only iron can break iron, and their false, fabricated faith can only be overcome by the true faith of Islam, for religious faith cannot be attacked except through religious faith. And truth shall eventually triumph, for truth is the strongest.

"We have already given Our Word to Our servants, the messengers, that they would be helped to victory and that Our army will triumph." (Koran, 37:171-173)

Article Thirty Five

The Islamic Resistance Movement studies the defeat of the Crusaders at the hands of Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi, the liberation of Palestine from them, as well as the defeat of the Mongols at 'Ayn Jalut and the breaking of their military strength at the hands of Qutuz and Al-Zahir Baybars, and the delivery of the Arab world from the Mongol conquest which destroyed all aspects of human civilization. [14] [The Islamic Resistance Movement] studies these [events] seriously, and draws lessons and examples from them. The current Zionist invasion was preceded by Crusader invasions from the west, and by Mongol invasion from the east. And just as the Muslims faced these invasions, made plans for fighting them and defeated them, they can [now] confront the Zionist invasion and defeat it. This not difficult for Allah, providing that intentions are sincere and resolve is strong, and that Muslims draw benefit from the experiences of the past, shed off the influences of the intellectual invasion, and follow the ways of their predecessors.

Conclusion: The Islamic Resistance Movement- Soldiers [for the Cause]
Article Thirty Six

The Islamic Resistance Movement, in its march forward, repeatedly emphasizes to all members of our people and of the Arab and Muslim peoples that it is not seeking fame for itself, or material gain, or social status, and that it is not aimed against any of our own people in an attempt to compete with them or to take their place - nothing of the kind. It does not oppose any Muslim, or any non-Muslim who is peaceful towards it, here [in Palestine] or elsewhere. It will always offer nothing but help to all groups and organizations that strive against the Zionist enemy and against its lackeys.
The Islamic Resistance Movement adopts Islam as its way of life. [Islam] is its creed and its law. [Any group that] adopts Islam as its way of life, here or elsewhere - be it an organization, association, state or any other group - the Islamic Resistance Movement will serve as its soldiers. We ask Allah to guide us, to guide [others] through us, and to judge between us and our people with truth.

"Oh, Lord, judge between us and our people with truth. You are the best of judges." (Koran, 7:89)

At the end, we beseech: Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Universe.

NOTES
[1] Islamonline, http://www.islamonline.net/Arabic/doc/2004/03/article11.SHTML.
[2] Hasan Al-Banna' (1906-1949) founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 and was its Director General until his assassination in 1949.

[3] Amjad Al-Zahawi was an Iraqi Sunni religious scholar who was affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood and active in various initiatives to support the Palestinian cause.

[4] Hamas is the Arabic acronym for Islamic Resistance Movement (harakat al-muqawama al-islamiyya); it is also an Arabic word meaning enthusiasm, ardor or zeal.

[5] Due to the importance of the concept of jihad in the Hamas ideology, we leave this term in Arabic wherever it appears in the text.

[6] The verses of Muhammad Iqbal (1873-1938), an Indian Muslim poet and religious thinker, are often used by both reformist and conservative Muslims in support of their opposite orientations.

[7] This is an often quoted verse by the famous pre-Islamic poet Tarafa.

[8] In medieval Islamic writings, Al-Sha'm usually refers to an area roughly corresponding to present-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.

[9] The word "nationalism" here and elsewhere in this document is used as the equivalent of the term wataniyya, which is derived from the Arabic word watan ("homeland"), and in modern Arabic discourse signifies particularist territorial nationalism, in contradistinction to qawmiyya, which also means "nationalism," but is used to refer to pan-Arab nationalism.

[10] The phrase "the followers of the Islamic movements" is used here to translate the Arabic term al-islamiyyun.

[11] In the Arabic original the verse is mistakenly given as 3:102.

[12] This is a well known Hadith (i.e., a saying attributed to the Prophet).

[13] These are two often quoted verses by the 7th century poet Miskin al-Darimi.

[14] Saif Al-Din Qutuz (d. 1260) was the Mamluk Sultan of Egypt from 1257 until his death. In 1260, the commander of his army, Al-Zahir Baybars (1223-1277), defeated the Mongols in the battle of Ain- Jalut.

 

HANSJ

7:31 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Are You Serious?

"Our only vital strategic interest there is to ensure that oil continues to flow to world markets, and reliable access to oil only requires that the region not be controlled by a single hostile power."

No actually, it's more than that. It's also about helping to ensure the economic viability of several major holders of US debt and the containment of exported terrorism.

If it were really only about keeping the oil flowing, the United States could have taken all of the massive military and economic resources it has squandered in Iraq to seize and hold the oil fields of the Gulf.

Oversimplification of a complex situation should not be be used as cover for a very apparent delight in America's "diminished" influence in the region.

 

LANCHIE

4:56 PM ET

February 16, 2011

us unterest

We've enriched this dude and for what, he's a muslum the same as the taliban. He basically has the same values and beliefs and other than the tribal implecations probably more like stavkovanie them than us. I suppose as long as the US is foolish enough to keep financing his BS he'll keep accepting it. But the value is not there, he is not loyal to US interests and will turn on us as soon as he can, he's not to be trusted.

 

Stephen M. Walt is the Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University.

Read More