Posted By Stephen M. Walt Share

When Zhou en-Lai was asked in the 1970s about the historical significance of the French Revolution, he famously responded that it was "too soon to tell." Given that wise caution, it is undoubtedly foolhardy for me to try to pick the winners and losers of the upheaval whose ultimate implications remain uncertain. But at the risk of looking silly in a few days (or weeks or months or years), I'm going to ignore the obvious pitfalls and forge ahead. Here's my current list of winners and losers, plus a third category: those for whom I have no idea.


The Winners


1. The Demonstrators
The obvious winners in these events are the thousands of ordinary Egyptians who poured into the streets to demand Mubarak's ouster, and to insist on the credible prospect of genuine reform. For this reason, Mubarak's designated deputy, Omar Suleiman, had to go too. Some of the demonstrators' activities were planned and coordinated (and we'll probably know a lot more about it over time) but a lot of it was the spontaneous expression of long-simmering frustration. By relying on non-violent methods, maintaining morale and discipline, and by insisting that Mubarak had to go, the anti-government uprising succeeded where prior protest campaigns had failed. "People power" with an Arab face. And oh yes: Google got a great product placement too.

2. Al Jazeera
With round-the-clock coverage that put a lot of Western coverage to shame, Al Jazeera comes out of these events with its reputation enhanced. Its ability to transmit these images throughout the Arab world may have given events in Tunisia and in Egypt far greater regional resonance. If Radio Cairo was the great revolutionary amplifier of the Nasser era, Al Jazeera may have emerged as an even more potent revolutionary force, as a medium that is shared by Arab publics and accessible to outsiders too. And I'll bet that is what Mubarak now thinks.

To continue reading this article, click here. 

 

LOBEWIPER

12:31 AM ET

February 15, 2011

Al Jazeera English's coverage

of the Egyptian revolution far exceeded that of any other news agency in both amount and quality. Americans need to request their TV supplier to provide AJE so that viewers can follow world events on the big screen instead of on their computers. AJE is known for telling both sides of stories, rather than the biased news the existing mainstream media are notorious for. Let's step up, people, and get ourselves a great deal more of the truth. It is ironic that AJE is available in Washington, DC to our policymakers, but not generally to the American public (with the exception of Burlington VT and Toledo OH). AJE is important enough so that is has been made available to our central government, but it's not important enough (or potentially hazardous) to the citizens of this country? There's something wrong with this picture...

 

AMERICAN JEWISH REALIST

1:47 PM ET

February 15, 2011

Non-violent Palestinian Revolution Against Israel?

Curious, why no media concern or discussion about a possible, likely imho, non- violent revolution against Israel? Clear context of harsh military occupation and illegal land grabs with population transfers continuing greater than dictator Mubarak's 30-year rule? Israeli and US support leader and religious corruption seems ubiquitious. Besides, Americans now with HUGE $financial$ crisis plus open, rabid Tea Party power activism supports democracy which loong time USA enablers. No doubt there is a growing recognition that the current situation is unsustainable, and 2-states is light-years better than 1-state. Much more ...

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

3:24 PM ET

February 15, 2011

I disagree

"Two states is light-years better than 1 state" I disagree, never has Israel offered a viable state to the Palestinians. I prefer one state with equal rights for all--that's democracy over theocracy.

I (thought) I posted here the argument that I don't think these protest could have occurred without the threat of Al Quaeda. Just as I believe the Black Panthers and Malcolm X made MLK seem like a reasonable man who was far less threatening to the Jim Crowers.

Gandhi benefited from this dialectic and no doubt the less threatening prospect of these Egyptian masses aren't as threatening. Further, it shows total erosion across a broad spectrum.

 

BABTIGERS

1:50 AM ET

February 16, 2011

The Western Media Failed

The United States news corporations are simply not news corporations but soap boxes for their respective supporting politicians to voice their opinions day and night to the American people. Whether its the complete ignorance and drek aired by the Fox news company or the constant bickering showcased on MSNBC the Western Media felt the snow storm that engulfed much of the country was a far more sensational story than an nation in uprising. Al- JAzeera provided non-stop coverage of an event that was truly worth reporting. In fact not only was their coverage constant but it was bipartisan which is something our broadcasters cannot seem to do anymore. Therefor the coverage we got was that of a snow storm something we experience annually, with a a hint of party politics of course.

The real problem is that unless you are 70% of Americans who enjoy listening to Rush LImbaugh's hateful preaching or The So called Great American Panels bable you will not ever get the sensational coverage AL- Jazeera provided for an event resembling the Egyptian protests.

 

JAY79

6:15 PM ET

February 20, 2011

Al Qaeda as losers?

Isn't the fall of American supported dictators in the region a stated goal of Al Qaeda? Shouldn't this go in their win column? Donald Rumsfeild believes that without the Afghanistan and Iraq wars these revolutions would not be possible, I tend to agree with him. If America was not militarily overextended as well as financially broke and internationally isolated because of these two failed wars I do not think America would be just idly standing by watching the like of Murbarak fall, (evidence the State departments early mixed signals on the Egyptian regime).

I guess it depends on ones belief in how sincere their rhetoric of Bin Laden is. All of these American allies in the Middle East are coming under pressure now and American regional influence is experiencing a low tide currently. I have to think instead of Bin Laden having a bad month of late he has been quite happy watching current developments wherever he is. It might not be Al Qaeda flag that these people are rallying behind, but either way it is part of their goals being achieved.

 

Stephen M. Walt is the Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University.

Read More