Posted By Stephen M. Walt Share

One of the great puzzles of contemporary national security policy is why the mighty United States gets its knickers in a twist over lots of security issues in lots of unimportant places. After all, it's the world's most advanced economy, by far the world's most powerful military force, it is insulated from many world problems by two enormous oceans (which do still matter, by the way), and it has an array of stable allies in most corners of the world. And oh yes, it has a nuclear deterrent consistent of thousands of warheads, more than enough to devastate any country that threatened the United States directly or threatened our independence.

Yet Americans are constantly fretting about supposedly grave threats in far-flung corners of the world, and marching off to spend billions (or even trillions) fighting long and inconclusive wars in strategic backwaters like Afghanistan. To be perfectly blunt, it makes one wonder if the national security establishment in this country is even capable of a careful, sober, even-tempered analysis anymore.

I say all this as a preamble to a recommendation for your reading list: Micah Zenko and Michael Cohen's terrific Foreign Affairs article "Clear and Present Safety." It's a rare piece of analytic sanity, and I hope it gets widely read. Money quotation:

"Within the foreign policy elite, there exists a pervasive belief that the post-Cold War world is treacherous place, full of great uncertainty and grave risks...There is just one problem. It is simply wrong. The world that the United States inhabits today is a remakably safe and secure place. It is a world with fewer violent conflicts and greater political freedom than at virtually any other point in human history...The United States faces no plausible existential threats, no great-power rival, and no near term competition for the role of global hegemon. The U.S. military is the world's most powerful, and even in the middle of a sustained downturn, the U.S economy remains among one of the world's most vibrant and adaptive...[Yet] this reality is barely reflect in U.S. national security strategy or in American foreign policy debates."

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

 

FOPASAFOLé

6:03 PM ET

February 23, 2012

What is constant in National Security

is the growth in the quantity of money CONgress is eager to shell out to feed the Beast.

With the real overall Defense budget close to a trillion dollars http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/the-real-defense-budget/253327/
instead of the made up confabulations of OfficialDumb, is it any surprise that the "elites" are frantically eager to "prove" how useful and necessary all this apparatus is?

With that much money, power and political prestige at stake, the official line from DC will always be tainted by undertones of fearmongering and how dangerous the "others" are.

 

DICKERSON3870

6:56 PM ET

February 23, 2012

"Why the mighty US gets its knickers in a twist..."

RE: "One of the great puzzles of contemporary national security policy is why the mighty United States gets its knickers in a twist over lots of security issues in lots of unimportant places." ~ Walt

SEE: How the Power of Myth Keeps Us Mired in War, by Ira Chernus, TomDispatch.com, 01/20/11

(excerpt) "...White Americans, going back to early colonial times, generally assigned the role of 'bad guys' to 'savages' lurking in the wilderness beyond the borders of our civilized land. Whether they were redskins, commies, terrorists, or the Taliban, the plot has always remained the same.
Call it the myth of national security -- or, more accurately, national insecurity, since it always tells us who and what to fear.
It’s been a mighty (and mighty effective) myth..."

SOURCE – http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/01/20-7

 

GRANT

10:01 PM ET

February 23, 2012

That's hardly fair. From the

That's hardly fair. From the 1950s to 1980s the Soviet Union was a constant threat to the United States, just as the U.S. was a constant threat to the Soviet Union. If there is a large, aggressive state with a strong military and nuclear weapons openly opposed to your politics of course you're going to want to increase your own military power.

 

DICKERSON3870

11:56 PM ET

February 23, 2012

P.S. "Why Israel gets its knickers in a twist..." "Why the mi

SEE: Israel’s Defense Chief OK’s Hundreds of Israeli Deaths, By Ira Chernus, CommonDreams.org, 11/11/11

(excerpt)...An essential motive of Zionism from its beginning was a fierce desire to end the centuries of Jewish weakness, to show the world that Jews would no longer be pushed around, that they’d fight back and prove themselves tougher than their enemies. There was more to Zionism than that. But the “pride through strength” piece came to dominate the whole project. Hence the massive Israeli military machine with its nuclear arsenal.
But you can’t prove that you’re stronger than your enemies unless you’ve also got enemies -- or at least believe you’ve got enemies -- to fight against. So there has to be a myth of Israel’s insecurity, fueled by an image of vicious anti-semites lurking somewhere out there, for Zionism to work. Since the 1979 Iranian revolution, Iran has gradually risen to the top of Israel oh-so-necessary enemies list. Iranophobia is rampant in Israel, as one Israeli scholar writes, because “Israel needs an existential threat."
Anyone who has grown up in Israel, or in the U.S. Jewish community (as I did), and paid attention knows all this...

ENTIRE COMMENTARY - http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/11/11-2

 

KUNINO

2:44 PM ET

February 24, 2012

Why?

Because there's a dollar in it. Lots of dollars in the suggestion that the US was under constant threat from the Soviet Union from 1950 to 1980. And here we have a reader reviving this assertion while seeing no reason to justify it. What exactly was that threat?

 

GRANT

8:32 PM ET

February 24, 2012

In re. to Dickerson3870:

In re. to Dickerson3870: Simply quoting some other source does not make your comment good.

In re. to Kunino: Absolutely. After all just look at how harmless the Soviet Union was. It had the largest military on the planet. The Soviet Union was the only nation that could physically reach the U.S and attack. It forcibly occupied Eastern Europe and parts of Central Europe. It had stole nuclear secrets from the U.S and developed its own nuclear weapons program (no doubt for humanitarian reasons). It made repeated statements about how Communism would overthrow capitalism. It based nuclear weapons in Cuba. Declassified documents show that the Soviet Union had always assumed that there was going to be another war fought in Europe.

I notice you also completely ignored my other point. That the Soviet Union and United States were a constant existential threat to each other. Our two nations were the only ones that could destroy the other without resorting to nuclear weapons. History has constantly shown for millennia that when two or more major powers with different ideologies or different state interests occupy the same space they will eventually grow hostile to each other.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:23 AM ET

February 27, 2012

Grant

we did all those things first, generally to the Soviets. We stole secrets from Germany, based missiles in Turkey. Had invaded all of our Southern Neighbors, several of the Soviet's Southern neighbors. We CHOSE the containment policy and enacted that against the Soviets, not the other way around. Your account turns the principle mover into the victim. But, at no time was the Soviet Union an existential threat to the US. We had them utter out classed for all but 7 years. During that 7 years, we had superiority of force, and capacity. The "Cold War" was a marketing gimmick for war contractors. Or, perhaps you think Ike was in incompetent.

 

GRANT

4:37 PM ET

February 27, 2012

In re. to Scottindallas:

In re. to Scottindallas: Apparently you haven't looked at the size of the Soviet military during the Cold War. It isn't inflated by much and there are reasons (besides budgetary ones) for why Eisenhower was hoping that nuclear deterrence could make up for the size of the military. Even if we don't take the size of the Soviet military into account it's still foolish to not consider the Soviet Union an existential threat because of the rather blatantly obvious fact that the Soviet Union had a nuclear force capable of reaching the U.S. Any nation capable of doing that (especially with the number of nuclear weapons the Soviets had) is de facto an existential threat.

Aside from that you show the same error that Kunino did. You completely miss my point that the two states were a constant existential threat to each other and automatically go on to presume that this means that I am biased against a nation. It's precisely the same as Palestinians and Israelis or Indians and Pakistanis.

On Eisenhower, I think he would have been a better president in an earlier time. He couldn't have predicted the Iranian Revolution but a bit more prudence would have helped and he delayed criticizing McCarthy too much even though he was one of the few people who could have done it without fear.

Incidentally I can't respond to your comment on invasions because based on your geographic and historic descriptions I don't have the faintest idea of even what continent, century or military matter you might be referring to. Are you referring to the war with Mexico in the 1840s? The support for the Greek government in the 1940s/1950s? The support for the coup in Iran in the 1950s? Something having to do with South Vietnam or South Korea? Until you give actual names and dates there is nothing to say.

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:36 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Double-Standards

America has been in partnership with Pakistan since 1947 and against India since then. America new India was the biggest democracy on earth despite poverty, illiteracy. etc. et., but, America, always acted against India, since 1947, till 9/11 and 26/11. Pakistan has been in partnership with China in occupation of the Indian Himalayas, since 1947. So America is in partnership with China against India. You have to choose between short term gains or long term stability of the world. The Himalayas have been part and partial of the Indian Civilization since India’s origin in the ‘Indus Valley’, since around, 5000 B.C, and, before.. The Hindu-Buddhist shrines in the Kashmir, Mount Kailash, Mansrover Lakes, etc., etc., are, no less important, to the, ‘Hindu-Indian Civilization’, than the Mecca-Medina, for the Muslims, in the Saudi Arabia. Yet the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan(IOP)’ created, in, 1947, by carving out, 1/3rd, of India(approved by UNO, UK, USA, …), has the right, to further occupy, the, Himalayas, in Kashmir, Hindu Kush-Mountains, etc., etc. Why does Islam undermine the rights of others? Who gave the right to the Islam to invade India from Afghanistan over centuries(1000-1700 A.D.) and occupy permanently by force with no regard(in fact extermination of others in 1947 ) of the original inhabitants, with different, religion than, theirs, in Punjab and Sindh. Himalayas are not only the permanent abode of Hindu shrines e.g., Amar Nath, Kailash Nath(Mount Kailash), Mansrvover Lakes, Indus(River), Badri Nath, Gangotri, Aravati, etc. etc., they are also the regions intimately connected to the beginning of the Hindu and Buddhists Civilizations since thousands of years in India. The IOP in partnership with China(since 1947) has also encouraged China to occupy, independent nation, the Tibet(1954), and the surrounding regions, which in no way belongs, to, China. They(IOP and China) are both colluding, in the Himalayas, to occupy, as much, of Himalayas, as possible. This is, the basic source, of ‘Fresh Water River Systems(e.g., Indus River, Ravi River, Brahama Putra River, etc., etc.) for India. With India’s population growing fast upward from 1.2 billions, the natural rain water, system, will not be able to, provide, enough, fresh water, for the coming generations. The Fresh water River systems in the Himalayas are the only hope for the supply of the fresh water for the whole country in the future and the natural renewable energy sources. Not only that, the future clean energy systems(e.g. the hydroelectric, etc., ), will also, originate, in, the Himalayas, in the future. The ‘natural fresh water river systems’ in the Himalayas, are being slowly occupied, by the clever manipulations, of China, and, the IOP. Most of the rivers in India have become the dumping ground for the sewage water disposed from the houses in big cities and the industries. This is not going to change as India has no worthwhile cleaning system to process the sewage water before dumping into the rivers. If India does not wake up now up to the virtues of the fresh water and renewable clean energy resources, in the Himalayas, the IOP, and the China will be, too happy, to claim, as their own. In fact large portions of the Himalayas have already been incorporated in the IOP and the Chinese territories. The Western and he Islamic nations are only interested in the Chinese and the, IOP, expansions, but not in India’s, future survival. Indians are busy as usual in their own in-fights(the 28 ‘Personal-States’), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

.

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:39 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Islamic Colonization Over centuries In INdia

The mighty nations on earth USA, China, UK, Russia, France, etc., etc. must realize that Islam, has been, colonizing, earth, as, the ‘Islamic Only Lands’ for the ‘Islamic Only People’ for centuries. All the Islamic Nations, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Yemen, etc., etc., are basically for the Islamic people only. Not much population of other faiths or religions live in these nations, and, even if they do, they are under, constant, persecution, by, the Islamic people. Some of these ‘Islamic Only Nations’ (Iran, Pakistan, etc.) have been created, since the establishment, of, the, UNO, whose function, is, to create harmony among people of different, faiths, religions, color, creed , caste, etc., etc. This is not what has been happening since the second world war, thought, to avoid, further wars. War on terror is also a war. It is taking away world resources, and, peace, on earth. The creation of ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’(from the Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, lands of India, in 1947) at the cost of, the millions massacred, and, the millions becoming refugees, in India, is only, a recent, incidence, of, the 1947. The, Islam, in, Syria, Egypt, Iran, etc., etc., now crushing, its own people, is a testimony to the effect, of, the ‘Islamic Only Control’ of the ‘Islamic Only Lands’, once they have colonized them, over, centuries, India is a typical example which exemplifies the real intentions of Islam, after India, is left over, with 2/3rd of India(N-S), with terrorist attacks, so, common still, in India. So the intentions are very clear ‘Islam’, and, nobody else, including the Islamic, dissentions, on, this, earth. What is happening in Afghanistan now is nothing more than the accumulated effect of the centuries of Islamic Armies(from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Uzbekistan, …etc., etc., gathering there and invading India. The efforts are still on to colonize whole of the Kashmir as the ‘Islamic Only Kashmir’. The days of the rest of India also ending up as the ‘Islamic Only India’ are not very far. The efforts are already there to create anarchy, fear, and, intimidation, by terrorist, attacks. China has played its dual role of terror, by, occupation, of. ‘Tibet’. by force. in 1954. and, is, in partnership with Pakistan, in, the occupation of vast areas, of, Himalayas(e.g. Kashmir, Mount Kailash, Nepal, etc., etc., ) which have nothing to do with China. If America could understand all this there is no need for them to waste their financial and military resources in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Once the Western Armies will be out of Afghanistan the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ will still be only Islamic and nobody else. They invite Western Nations(Britain invited in 1700 A.D. in India by Islam) to do their dirty job of controlling their people( Islamic or otherwise) and once the job is over they are still where they started ‘The Islamic Only Nations’. Is that what for the World is wasting its resources, e.g., from ‘Islam-Abad’, to, ‘Islam-Indi-Abad’ There is no oil in Afghanistan or Pakistan. But it does not take an Einstein to understand that Afghanistan and Pakistan are the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ as are the oil nations of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, etc., etc. I wonder how can I make it clearer than this. I have said in English language which is well understood world wide. Saying in Tamil language will only hide the facts. Indians now are busy as usual in their own in-fights(14 to the 28 ‘Personal-States’, since 1947, more, will come, soon), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

GRANT

9:57 PM ET

February 23, 2012

Why not see it as a very U.K.

Why not see it as a very U.K. outlook on the world. If there's no great power dominating a continent it can't threaten the U.S.. Additionally great powers seem more inclined to want to act across the world compared to smaller nations that are more concerned with their immediate security and regional problems.

 

EZRA

7:26 AM ET

February 27, 2012

j

"If there's no great power dominating a continent it can't threaten the U.S."

Yes, that would be a good strategy, but what does fighting in Afghanistan for more than ten years have to do with preventing other great powers from dominating their continents?

 

GRANT

4:50 PM ET

February 27, 2012

Afghanistan really doesn't.

Afghanistan really doesn't. It's justifiable on the grounds that they were allowing Al Qaeda to remain there and had the U.S government bothered to work more with the U.N and pressure Pakistan we might have gotten a better result* but it wasn't a matter of international power. I was referring more to China and Russia**. I'm not fully convinced by Mackinder's theories but either nation has potential power to dominate a portion of Eurasia. Of course I don't think China or Russia are really going to be that dangerous for at least another twenty years (probably longer) but if there is a way of making sure that they can't dominate their region at a relatively low cost I see no reason not to use it so long as the U.S doesn't get carried away into conflicts that aren't that important.

Incidentally just imagine the kind of security concerns the U.S might face if it didn't dominate North America. As things are the U.S only has two nations to worry about and neither is an enemy. That is a key advantage that Russia and China can only wish for.

*Though I'm skeptical of that considering the barely existent Afghan state for decades and the incredible corruption among many of the key actors.
** There really isn't another nation in East Asia that could dominate it for the foreseeable future and the rest of the nations that could conceivably dominate a region such as India, Germany, France and Brazil are democracies (and democracies rarely go to war with each other).

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:11 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Afghanistan-Pakistan-India

The mighty nations on earth USA, China, UK, Russia, France, etc., etc. must realize that Islam, has been, colonizing, earth, as, the ‘Islamic Only Lands’ for the ‘Islamic Only People’ for centuries. All the Islamic Nations, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Yemen, etc., etc., are basically for the Islamic people only. Not much population of other faiths or religions live in these nations, and, even if they do, they are under, constant, persecution, by, the Islamic people. Some of these ‘Islamic Only Nations’ (Iran, Pakistan, etc.) have been created, since the establishment, of, the, UNO, whose function, is, to create harmony among people of different, faiths, religions, color, creed , caste, etc., etc. This is not what has been happening since the second world war, thought, to avoid, further wars. War on terror is also a war. It is taking away world resources, and, peace, on earth. The creation of ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’(from the Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, lands of India, in 1947) at the cost of, the millions massacred, and, the millions becoming refugees, in India, is only, a recent, incidence, of, the 1947. The, Islam, in, Syria, Egypt, Iran, etc., etc., now crushing, its own people, is a testimony to the effect, of, the ‘Islamic Only Control’ of the ‘Islamic Only Lands’, once they have colonized them, over, centuries, India is a typical example which exemplifies the real intentions of Islam, after India, is left over, with 2/3rd of India(N-S), with terrorist attacks, so, common still, in India. So the intentions are very clear ‘Islam’, and, nobody else, including the Islamic, dissentions, on, this, earth. What is happening in Afghanistan now is nothing more than the accumulated effect of the centuries of Islamic Armies(from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Uzbekistan, …etc., etc., gathering there and invading India. The efforts are still on to colonize whole of the Kashmir as the ‘Islamic Only Kashmir’. The days of the rest of India also ending up as the ‘Islamic Only India’ are not very far. The efforts are already there to create anarchy, fear, and, intimidation, by terrorist, attacks. China has played its dual role of terror, by, occupation, of. ‘Tibet’. by force. in 1954. and, is, in partnership with Pakistan, in, the occupation of vast areas, of, Himalayas(e.g. Kashmir, Mount Kailash, Nepal, etc., etc., ) which have nothing to do with China. If America could understand all this there is no need for them to waste their financial and military resources in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Once the Western Armies will be out of Afghanistan the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ will still be only Islamic and nobody else. They invite Western Nations(Britain invited in 1700 A.D. in India by Islam) to do their dirty job of controlling their people( Islamic or otherwise) and once the job is over they are still where they started ‘The Islamic Only Nations’. Is that what for the World is wasting its resources, e.g., from ‘Islam-Abad’, to, ‘Islam-Indi-Abad’ There is no oil in Afghanistan or Pakistan. But it does not take an Einstein to understand that Afghanistan and Pakistan are the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ as are the oil nations of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, etc., etc. I wonder how can I make it clearer than this. I have said in English language which is well understood world wide. Saying in Tamil language will only hide the facts. Indians now are busy as usual in their own in-fights(14 to the 28 ‘Personal-States’, since 1947, more, will come, soon), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

TOIVOS

10:36 PM ET

February 23, 2012

American fear

We are a very fearful country. It first really hit home with me when Khomeni issued the fatwa against Rushdie for his Satanic Verses. I noticed that the local Barns and Nobel bookstore immediately pulled the book from its shelves because they feared an attack. Our reaction to 911 was even more cowardly. Millions of Americans were willing to sacrifice their freedom for minor increases in security.

We are a very, very fearful people, cowering in our homes worried about the most inconsequential risks. Our motto, "land of the free, home of the brave" has been rendered obsolete in the past few decades. We need to find another.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:26 AM ET

February 27, 2012

we fear

cause we have so much to lose. Of course, we know what history teaches us about fat and complacent people. We must be fat and complacent to be fearful, though that's not the only way one might be described as fearful

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:14 AM ET

March 20, 2012

India-America

Democracy in India has been a family(Nehrus, Gandhis, etc., etc.) affair since its freedom from the British in1947. Since the then the ‘mighty class’ of Indians have manipulated India into 14 to 28 ‘Personal States’, while the British, created, 14, for them. They have no regard to the purpose of improving the plight of the ordinary, underprivileged and helpless people in India. There are many nations(‘Personal States’) within the nation now. They say the divisions are on the base of different languages(by legislation) which is a lie as there are ‘Personal States’ (e.g. the Haryana) which have no genuine independent language, just, might, is right, is their language. Why so many languages and so many States and why individual language is so important after all? All you need is a language which allows people in different parts of India to communicate and move efficiently and freely without prejudice. It is English language that does that job and not the Hindi. Don’t people matter? You are a human to survive first and ‘language person’ later. If English language is ‘a foreign language’ so is ‘Islamic Religion’, otherwise, there, wouldn’t, be, a, separate, ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’. India adapted Islam over centuries and lost one third of the country as ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’ in 1947. Are you planning 14-28.. nations in India. . for the future? Do you have any respect of an Indian as a human in India? One may say there are 55 States in America why not more in India. America is not divided like India on languages, religion, illiteracy, .. . It is one mighty nation. Nobody can attack America from anywhere in the world leave aside its neighbors. Does India has nationhood of that stature? You have to have a common goal to achieve something for your people. The neighbors China and Pakistan are in partnership since 1947 and have occupied many lands in the Himalayas, e.g. Kashmir, Tibet, etc., etc. India has no means to claim what is its own, because, it is divided, internally, as ever, not only morally(first religion now languages), but, also, militarily. India is not a one nation like America. The various resources in the country do not act in cohesion to develop India as one nation. The literacy level of an Indian in India is nowhere near a person in America. The fairness in law and order in India does not exist. One has to know one of the ‘mighty class of Indian leaders’ to get some where. The new younger generation has nothing to look forward to despite, their hard work, in, attaining, a reasonable level of literacy, education, and, training, etc. There are no projects to utilize the resources of the new emerging generations. The Tamils in SriLanka deserve equal rights with the rest of the SriLankans rather than being treated as third class citizens. Merit of an individual person must be respected towards building a nation, irrespective, of, religion or language. Islamic religious terror, was used, to, create ‘Islamic Only Nation of Pakistan’, out of India in 1947. Do you want to do the same on languages now in India? The China-Pakistan, partnership, as neighbors, to, India, is, already doing, and, will, continue in the future, to destabilize, India, by infiltration ,of terror, amongst, the people, of, India, and, it is so easy, for them, to do, it. Indians, are still busy, as usual, in their own in-fights(14 to the 28 ‘Personal-States’, since 1947, more, will come, soon), even, today. First have a nation and then distribute ‘rewards(booty)’ on languages, otherwise, you, will be left with nothing, very, soon. The Indian leaders have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindhi and Bengal-called as the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’ now). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:17 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Iran-America-India

America and so must India understand that it is the 'Islamic Way' to invite a foreign power when they start loosing 'Isalmic Grip' on their people or other people. In 1700 A.D. the Islamic Empire in India colllapsed but they did not yet finish their job of converting whole India into 'Islamic Only India'. They partially finished the job of 'Islamic Only Pakistan' in 1947 through th British. Once America finishes its job of wasting trillions of dollars in the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan-Afghanistn, the Islam will restart its business of, the unfinished job of 1947, converting the rest of India, into. the ‘Islamic Only India’. One must remember Afghanistan never could become a nation as Islamic Armies from Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Uzbekistan, etc., etc., used to assemble there, since 100 A.D., and attacked India, for centuries, to transform India into 'Islamic Only India'. In 1947 they claimed 1/3rd (E-W) of India as 'Islamic Only Pakistan'. So Pakistan is Afghanistan and Afghanistan is Pakistan. This is a catch 22 situation which one will you catch first. Iran the ‘Islamic Only Nation’ like Pakistan ‘ becoming, nuclear power, should, be, of little, concern, to the ‘Western Nations’, as Pakistan, already, is, a nuclear power. An Islamic(nuclear later) Power. Pakistan, was created, by the British, by carving out, 1/3rd(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal) of India, in 1947. It was created, as an ‘Islamic Only(later nuclear as well) Nation-the Pakistan’. This was with the approval of, the UNO, the stamping, authority. The UNO was used for creating a new nation the-‘Islamic Only-the Pakistan’, in 1947, yet, the UNO, is committed, to, no discrimination, among the people(millions massacred and million became refuges in India in 1947) on religious grounds. This ‘religious ritual’, was later, followed, by the Iran, and, declared itself, as the ‘Islamic Only Nation’, not very, long ago. Now, Iran, is trying, to be ‘(double) Islamic-Nuclear(trouble), as well. Should it be of any concern to the rest of the world?. Pakistan already is(double-trouble), and, was, approved, by, America, Britain, France, China, and the Russia( the security council). This expansion of the double ‘Nuclear-Islamic’ terror, from Pakistan to Iran, has now become, a worry, for the ‘Western Nations’. One should not forget that the ‘Western Armies’ are now assembled in ‘Afghanistan’ where the ‘Islamic Armies’ from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Mongolia(Genghis Khans-Chinese), Uzbekistan, etc. etc, once assembled(1000-1700 A.D.) and invaded India, over centuries, to, transform, India, into, Islamic Only Nation’. The Islam crumbled, in India, in 1700 A.D., and invited, the British, to finish the rest of the job. They did finish the job, in 1947, with a reward, to the Islam, the ‘Islamic Only -Pakistan’. The Western Armies are fighting war, on terror(Islam), by, assembling, in Afghanistan (Iraq, before, what for?). They are assembled, now, in Afghanistan, far away, from their homes, to safeguard, against, 9/11, that, it dose not happen again, in their own home. It, happened, in India, all right, but it was. 26/11. Is there any difference between the two? Is, India, a double, Islamic-Nuclear, trouble? Is the West using the Islam or the Islam using the West and what for? The Afghanistan, is the base, of terror. Do you have to make way for the Islam, ’or else’leave the earth? But ‘where to’, may be, to the Mars, as refugees, if, lucky enough. Indians are busy as usual in their own in-fights(the 14 to 28 ‘Personal-States’- more will follow), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

. …

 

CENSORSHIP

11:01 PM ET

February 23, 2012

I noticed something

how come some peoples comments that were on here before seem to have disappeared? maybe im wrong, but im getting a strong whiff of selected censorship being used on this site...

is that possible? I read so mny terrible things on this site in these comments section...I just wonder why some are removed and others, whose comments are truly vile, are left to keep posting?

seems rather strange ....

and here I though foreignpolicy was not into propaganda...

 

TEXASAGGIE

3:52 AM ET

February 24, 2012

Change for the better

Walts blog comments were some of the worst on the site. There is a way to say you agree/disagree without being offensive. Walts articles would be hijacked; maybe he can comment and amend things like Tom Ricks does on his now.

The problem of threat inflation is nothing new. It would be more interesting if who talked about maybe why people think this way. You either believe America has responsibility around the world or it does not. If you believe we should control everything, then anything that threatens access denial is dangerous. China South China sea? They want to be a regional player so we are worried about China's rise. Its like if you walk into someone else's backyard and have a shotgun; and they have a shotgun. Well obviously the neighbor with the shotgun is a threat. (Nation States. NGO's require a different analogy.) Politically there is little difference between Republican FP ideas/ideals and democrats.

Unless you of course support Ron Paul... (Sorry couldn't resist. haha)

 

DIANA RELKE

11:02 PM ET

February 23, 2012

rotting

Agreed, Stephen. Your argument supports my belief that if the GOP is so intent upon reducing the size of government, they should start with Homeland Security. 90 percent of that bloated, anxiety-riddled monstrosity could be eliminated without the slightest negative impact on security.

The only real and persistent threat to American security is covered in Cohen's "Rotting from the Inside Out":

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/02/21/rotting_from_the_inside_out

Throughout the Cold War, the War itself was always the excuse for not attending to the public sphere. That neglect got to be a bad habit. Now what's left of the social safety net is being blamed by the GOP and others for the glacial pace of recovery.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:31 AM ET

February 27, 2012

the death penalty

It costs 5-7 times more to kill a man than to lock him up for life. But, pathetic conservatives seem willing to spare no expense for a show, and death shows have long been popular with the religious, emotional set. Our inability to craft broad, (small c) conservative policies that are prudent fiscally and restrained is our undoing. We want to conflate all drug users with drug dealers, every murder as a capital murder, and every dissident as a terrorist.

 

JOHNBOY4546

7:23 AM ET

February 24, 2012

Didn't Moore answer that question in "Bowling for Columbine"?

Americans are fearful because the entire apparatus of state is geared towards keeping them afraid.

It doesn't matter *what* or *who* are today's boggieman, so long as there is always someone jumping up in front of the American Sheeple, waving their arms about and yelling Boogie! Boogie! Boogie! Boogie!

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:22 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Fear Encourages Terrorism

The mighty nations on earth USA, China, UK, Russia, France, etc., etc. must realize that Islam, has been, colonizing, earth, as, the ‘Islamic Only Lands’ for the ‘Islamic Only People’ for centuries. All the Islamic Nations, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Yemen, etc., etc., are basically for the Islamic people only. Not much population of other faiths or religions live in these nations, and, even if they do, they are under, constant, persecution, by, the Islamic people. Some of these ‘Islamic Only Nations’ (Iran, Pakistan, etc.) have been created, since the establishment, of, the, UNO, whose function, is, to create harmony among people of different, faiths, religions, color, creed , caste, etc., etc. This is not what has been happening since the second world war, thought, to avoid, further wars. War on terror is also a war. It is taking away world resources, and, peace, on earth. The creation of ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’(from the Punjab, Sindh, Bengal, lands of India, in 1947) at the cost of, the millions massacred, and, the millions becoming refugees, in India, is only, a recent, incidence, of, the 1947. The, Islam, in, Syria, Egypt, Iran, etc., etc., now crushing, its own people, is a testimony to the effect, of, the ‘Islamic Only Control’ of the ‘Islamic Only Lands’, once they have colonized them, over, centuries, India is a typical example which exemplifies the real intentions of Islam, after India, is left over, with 2/3rd of India(N-S), with terrorist attacks, so, common still, in India. So the intentions are very clear ‘Islam’, and, nobody else, including the Islamic, dissentions, on, this, earth. What is happening in Afghanistan now is nothing more than the accumulated effect of the centuries of Islamic Armies(from Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Uzbekistan, …etc., etc., gathering there and invading India. The efforts are still on to colonize whole of the Kashmir as the ‘Islamic Only Kashmir’. The days of the rest of India also ending up as the ‘Islamic Only India’ are not very far. The efforts are already there to create anarchy, fear, and, intimidation, by terrorist, attacks. China has played its dual role of terror, by, occupation, of. ‘Tibet’. by force. in 1954. and, is, in partnership with Pakistan, in, the occupation of vast areas, of, Himalayas(e.g. Kashmir, Mount Kailash, Nepal, etc., etc., ) which have nothing to do with China. If America could understand all this there is no need for them to waste their financial and military resources in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Once the Western Armies will be out of Afghanistan the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ will still be only Islamic and nobody else. They invite Western Nations(Britain invited in 1700 A.D. in India by Islam) to do their dirty job of controlling their people( Islamic or otherwise) and once the job is over they are still where they started ‘The Islamic Only Nations’. Is that what for the World is wasting its resources, e.g., from ‘Islam-Abad’, to, ‘Islam-Indi-Abad’ There is no oil in Afghanistan or Pakistan. But it does not take an Einstein to understand that Afghanistan and Pakistan are the ‘Islamic Only Nations’ as are the oil nations of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, etc., etc. I wonder how can I make it clearer than this. I have said in English language which is well understood world wide. Saying in Tamil language will only hide the facts. Indians now are busy as usual in their own in-fights(14 to the 28 ‘Personal-States’, since 1947, more, will come, soon), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

JASPERV

11:21 AM ET

February 24, 2012

America is insecure

I can't help but to quote Allen Hynek comment on project Blue Book
<"Everything works as if the only thing the Pentagon reacted to was a
little old lady in Nebraska who happened to be the widow of some stockbroker who left her 51% of General Motors and 60% of General Electric
when he died. If that woman ever sees anything alien in the sky, or if
she reads in the National Enquirer that a dozen Martians have just landed in Florida, she gets very scared and she calls her Congressman. Since
he counts on her to put up most of the money for his next election campaign, he gets very excited himself and he writes a terse note to the Secretary of the Air Force, demanding to know what they're doing to protect
his constituents with all their billions of dollars!">
yes for me who is not an American I can only feel that the Americans suffer from
an Obsessive–compulsive disorder in matter of threats, security and weapons
so no amount of weapons, perceived enemies eliminated. could bring peace to the heart of this old American lady .... God saves from old lady America!! .. Amen!

 

MATTW0699

4:05 PM ET

February 24, 2012

The Thanksgiving Turkey Process

Let us visit our friend the turkey a few weeks before Thanksgiving, and ask him about his future. His entire life has always been pretty good. He gets plenty to eat and drink. He gets a roof over his head and free medical care. When asked about his future he explains he can't imagine things getting bad because they have always been good. He thinks his future will be rosy.

The problem is that the turkey thinks he understands the process that drives his life forward, but he really doesn't. The butcher understands the process, but the turkey doesn't.

Hasn't anyone noticed that we live in a Thanksgiving turkey process?

The Soviet Union was relatively stable for many years, then bam - collapse. Arab countries were relatively stable for many years, then bam - revolution. The US economy was relatively stable for many years, then bam - meltdown.

Since everyone feels safe and is not the slightest bit concerned about a nuclear attack, they are disarming America.. They are preparing the way for Thanksgiving.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:37 AM ET

February 27, 2012

there aren't giants

who bring us our food, who built our housing, nor, will some calamity befall us and we all end up dead. There is no telos, no simple end to time--even nuclear war. Your thought experiment is akin to assuming that every bullet made was destined to find a skull to crack open.

 

GARVAGH

11:27 PM ET

February 24, 2012

Is the Washington mind-set too reflective of lobbyists?

Do rabid partisans of Israel in Washington promote the false notion of insecurity, to facilitate continuing subsidies of Israel? And "defence" lobbyists promote the same notion, for obvioius reasons?

Great piece.

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:39 AM ET

February 27, 2012

Do they?

OF course. I appreciate your separating the Israel lobby from the war lobby. There are many overlaps, and many in both camps, but they are different forces. We too often jump on one and sound either anti-gov't or Israel as we conflate more sins to one party than they deserve.

 

S HENDRICKS

11:56 PM ET

February 24, 2012

It's easy to sell fear

Blah, blah blah...

It's also really easy to get a passport and get out of the bubble and see the world.

Around 35 percent of Americans hold a valid passport -- up nearly a third since they were required for travel to Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean.

At the risk of gross generalization, most Americans are not very adventurous travelers. Europe is not adventurous -- it is another version of the post-industrial bourgeois lifestyle most Americans have, but with "bad English food" and "rude French people" and other hoary tales. Oh, and a fairly recent history of devastating bloodshed that tends to give them a slightly less enthusiastic take on reckless warmongering.

And yet we "know" so much about what we think of other countries.

Iran issues something like 500 visas a year to US citizens. But every red-blooded American is supposed to know in their heart that the whole place is "evil", rather than a complex society with a highly educated public and a rich history that happens to be run by crackpots and religious zealots. (Sound familiar?) Yes, some Americans have been thrown in jail, not good. But FYI, Iranian nationals in the US are also put under very tight restrictions -- eg, movement radius of 25 miles from Columbus Circle in NYC.

And we used to get along so well...

Having worked and/or traveled in some certifiably dangerous places, some very poor ones, some not, I can attest (based on the usual inquiries) that many Americans simply see much of the world as an inherently "scary" place. And yet what you find most anywhere is that people like a laugh, some common courtesy and something to eat, and they think their government is populated by idiots. Never once have I been harassed, insulted or abused for being American. Well, maybe in Europe, but who cares.

Sorry -- not meant as a rant... Much appreciated the point of this piece.

The thing is -- How to counteract this persistent attitude of fear?

It isn't going to change from the top down, obviously, because it is a goldmine, as pretty much everyone here has pointed out.

Maybe if more Americans spent more time seeing the world, and less time judging it, things might start to change.

Just leave the camo at home.

As some old guy in a wheelchair once said, "We have nothing to fear..."

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:49 AM ET

February 27, 2012

My friends

And I are into rogue travel. Nothing so adventurous as that even sounds, but just going to foreign (3rd world) countries, and getting in with the locals, and largely avoiding the tourist traps. You said you were never mistreated. But, I suspect that you're understating it (unless you are an oil, or other international contractor); Americans are treated as superstars. Everyone wants to meet you. It seems often you find most people will give you things rather than take advantage of you. But, there's always folks who want to take advantage, everywhere. If you're so disposed, and have some honest, critical words for the US gov't, you will be treated like a sage movie star. I'm quite anxious to travel again, and want to live abroad for a decade or so. This country will get worse before it gets better, and I can't see how leaving for a decade could be wrong. The developing world is rising so fast, while we are suffering an inevitable malaise.

 

CYNTHIAWILSON

4:36 AM ET

February 26, 2012

threaten of USA

I think the threaten for USA is they are foreign policy and anti terrorist activities.
Every year many general people are died for their anti terrorist activities in Afghanistan , Pakistan and many other countries. So the people of affected are can be very dangerous for USA. We saw before the terrorist actives they destroy the twin towers - world trade center. So USA can be effected any way.

cynthiawilson

 

SCOTTINDALLAS

9:17 AM ET

February 27, 2012

we see

who cares about America. We have many people on these boards, those not present here, who comment about what 'we" need to do. Their loyalties are affiliations are unknown, and suspect to many. But, we see here those who care about America, and those who's loyalty lies in other lands, with other peoples.

 

PEARPANDAS

4:13 PM ET

March 2, 2012

I think this confidence quote

I think this confidence quote from Obama is simply meant to calm people down. It is obvious we are not secure, but neither is any country - not really.

Right now the threats seem so ambiguous that there doesn't even seem like something we can prevent or even anticipate. These quotes by Obama are just meant to prevent our fears from getting the better of us and I think we should let them do their job!

 

PEARPANDAS

5:49 PM ET

March 8, 2012

Also, Defense Secretary Leon

Also, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, along with Pentagon Comptroller Robert F. Hale, logged their third day of Congressional budget testimony, speaking before the House Appropriations Committee’s defense subcomittee.

Under the 2013 budget request, the Defence Departmentwill spend $614 billion in fiscal 2013, divided between a $525.4 billion base budget and $88.5 billion covering war costs. The request incorporates the 2011 Budget Control Act’s requirement for a $487 billion reduction in defense spending over the next 10 years. The act also included a “sequestration” provision for an additional $500 billion in across-the-board cuts to take effect in January if Congress does not pass a planto reduce the budget.

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

12:47 AM ET

March 20, 2012

America As A ROLE MODEL for Indian Democracy

If you want rest of the world to follow democratic principles then you must educate them about its benefits as well. Democracy in India has been a family(Nehrus, Gandhis, etc., etc.) affair since its freedom from the British in1947. Since the then the ‘mighty class’ of Indians have manipulated India into 14 to 28 ‘Personal States’, while the British, created, 14, for them. They have no regard to the purpose of improving the plight of the ordinary, underprivileged and helpless people in India. There are many nations(‘Personal States’) within the nation now. They say the divisions are on the base of different languages(by legislation) which is a lie as there are ‘Personal States’ (e.g. the Haryana) which have no genuine independent language, just, might, is right, is their language. Why so many languages and so many States and why individual language is so important after all? All you need is a language which allows people in different parts of India to communicate and move efficiently and freely without prejudice. It is English language that does that job and not the Hindi. Don’t people matter? You are a human to survive first and ‘language person’ later. If English language is ‘a foreign language’ so is ‘Islamic Religion’, otherwise, there, wouldn’t, be, a, separate, ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’. India adapted Islam over centuries and lost one third of the country as ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’ in 1947. Are you planning 14-28.. nations in India. . for the future? Do you have any respect of an Indian as a human in India? One may say there are 55 States in America why not more in India. America is not divided like India on languages, religion, illiteracy, .. . It is one mighty nation. Nobody can attack America from anywhere in the world leave aside its neighbors. Does India has nationhood of that stature? You have to have a common goal to achieve something for your people. The neighbors China and Pakistan are in partnership since 1947 and have occupied many lands in the Himalayas, e.g. Kashmir, Tibet, etc., etc. India has no means to claim what is its own, because, it is divided, internally, as ever, not only morally(first religion now languages), but, also, militarily. India is not a one nation like America. The various resources in the country do not act in cohesion to develop India as one nation. The literacy level of an Indian in India is nowhere near a person in America. The fairness in law and order in India does not exist. One has to know one of the ‘mighty class of Indian leaders’ to get some where. The new younger generation has nothing to look forward to despite, their hard work, in, attaining, a reasonable level of literacy, education, and, training, etc. There are no projects to utilize the resources of the new emerging generations. The Tamils in SriLanka deserve equal rights with the rest of the SriLankans rather than being treated as third class citizens. Merit of an individual person must be respected towards building a nation, irrespective, of, religion or language. Islamic religious terror, was used, to, create ‘Islamic Only Nation of Pakistan’, out of India in 1947. Do you want to do the same on languages now in India? The China-Pakistan, partnership, as neighbors, to, India, is, already doing, and, will, continue in the future, to destabilize, India, by infiltration ,of terror, amongst, the people, of, India, and, it is so easy, for them, to do, it. Indians, are still busy, as usual, in their own in-fights(14 to the 28 ‘Personal-States’, since 1947, more, will come, soon), even, today. First have a nation and then distribute ‘rewards(booty)’ on languages, otherwise, you, will be left with nothing, very, soon. The Indian leaders have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindhi and Bengal-called as the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan’ now). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

1:02 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Pakistan The Islamic Colonizer of the Indian Lands in 1947

The Punjab, Sindh, Bengal(PSB), Kashmir, lands of India, were systematically, occupied, as the ‘Islamic Only Lands’, by, the, repeated, invasions, of India, starting 1000 A.D., by the ‘Islamic Armies’, assembled, in Afghanistan, from, the neighboring, countries, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Mongolia, Uzbekistan, etc, etc. The ‘Islamic Population’ of India was zero before 1000 A.D. The Islamic invasions over centuries ultimately led to the ‘Islamic Only Rule’ of India till 1700 A.D. The local Indian(Hindu-Sikh) populations were brutalized, terrorized, threatened, etc,.etc., to ‘Convert To Islam’, or else, face, extermination. This continued till 1700 A.D., when the ‘Terrorist Islamic Rule’, in India, faltered, except in Bengal. In the West(Punjab, Sindh and Kashmir), the Hindu-Sikh, resistance forces, rose up, and gained, control, of the lands, Punjab, Sindh and Kashmir, of, India. The only existing Islamic ruler at that time, was, in the Bengal, who got worried, of his existence, and of the Islam, in the rest, of India, and, invited, the British, to stop further, the rest India, becoming liberated, from, the Islam. Islam, was as foreign(and still is) to India, as were, the British. The British, made, use, of the Hindu-Muslim, divisions, among the Indian(but the Islam was still foreign) populations, where the sizable ‘Islamic Religious Populations’ had multiplied and spread all over India. For nearly three centuries(1700-1947), the British ruled India, and, in 1947, divided, India, into the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan(IOP)’, the-Islamic Dictatorship, comprising Punjab, Sindh and Bengal(East-West), and, the left over, ‘N-S India’, as-the Democratic ‘India Only Secular’, nations. The PSB(Hindu-Sikh) populations, millions, massacred, and, the millions, becoming refugees, ended up, paying, the price, for the ‘Islamic Only Creation(the IOP), in 1947. This was all approved by the West and UNO. Very soon(1947) the IOP, attacked, Kashmir, to claim it, as part, of the IOP(Islamic Only Occupied Kashmir). The half of the Kashmir was then occupied by the IOP and was also approved by the West and the UNO. Now the ‘Western Armies’ have assembled in Afghanistan, to stop, further, occupation(brutalization), of earth, by ‘Islam’. Is Islam a terror? The occupation, of, India by Islam, by terror, over centuries, is not, the only, living example, but, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Tunisia, Somalia, Sudan, Nigeria, etc., etc, are the testimony, of what, the ‘Islam’, wants on this earth. Are, the ‘Western Armies’, now(compare with the ‘Islamic Armies assembled there over 1000-1700 A.D, assembled), in, Afghanistan, to counter the ‘Terror of Islam’ or some thing not known to the rest of the world? Sooner, or later, it will, boil over, to the truth, so important, for the peace, on earth. Remember, no peace, means, no progress, and no, prosperity either, on the, earth. China is another force of terror who occupied the Buddhist-‘Tibet’ and the vast areas of the Indian Himalayas, since, the 1950s, again, under the approval of the West and the UNO. At, present, as in the past, the terror is still, engulfing, the world. It has to be one way or the other for the ‘Civilized World’ to go forward or backward. What is the choice? Do you have a choice? The Indians are busy as usual, even today, in their own in-fights(the 28 ‘Personal-States’ created, since 1947 and more will come), as they were in 1000A.D, when the Islam put its first step on the Indian soil. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

1:08 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Himalayas(Kashmir, Tibet, Nepal, etc.) are Hindu-Budhist Lands

The Himalayas have been part and partial of the Indian Civilization since India’s origin in the ‘Indus Valley’, since around, 5000 B.C, and, before.. The Hindu-Buddhist shrines in the Kashmir, Mount Kailash, Mansrover Lakes, etc., etc., are, no less important, to the, ‘Hindu-Indian Civilization’, than the Mecca-Medina, for the Muslims, in the Saudi Arabia. Yet the ‘Islamic Only Pakistan(IOP)’ created, in, 1947, by carving out, 1/3rd, of India(approved by UNO, UK, USA, …), has the right, to further occupy, the, Himalayas, in Kashmir, Hindu Kush-Mountains, etc., etc. Why does Islam undermine the rights of others? Who gave the right to the Islam to invade India from Afghanistan over centuries(1000-1700 A.D.) and occupy permanently by force with no regard(in fact extermination of others in 1947 ) of the original inhabitants, with different, religion than, theirs, in Punjab and Sindh. Himalayas are not only the permanent abode of Hindu shrines e.g., Amar Nath, Kailash Nath(Mount Kailash), Mansrvover Lakes, Indus(River), Badri Nath, Gangotri, Aravati, etc. etc., they are also the regions intimately connected to the beginning of the Hindu and Buddhists Civilizations since thousands of years in India. The IOP in partnership with China(since 1947) has also encouraged China to occupy, independent nation, the Tibet(1954), and the surrounding regions, which in no way belongs, to, China. They(IOP and China) are both colluding, in the Himalayas, to occupy, as much, of Himalayas, as possible. This is, the basic source, of ‘Fresh Water River Systems(e.g., Indus River, Ravi River, Brahama Putra River, etc., etc.) for India. With India’s population growing fast upward from 1.2 billions, the natural rain water, system, will not be able to, provide, enough, fresh water, for the coming generations. The Fresh water River systems in the Himalayas are the only hope for the supply of the fresh water for the whole country in the future and the natural renewable energy sources. Not only that, the future clean energy systems(e.g. the hydroelectric, etc., ), will also, originate, in, the Himalayas, in the future. The ‘natural fresh water river systems’ in the Himalayas, are being slowly occupied, by the clever manipulations, of China, and, the IOP. Most of the rivers in India have become the dumping ground for the sewage water disposed from the houses in big cities and the industries. This is not going to change as India has no worthwhile cleaning system to process the sewage water before dumping into the rivers. If India does not wake up now up to the virtues of the fresh water and renewable clean energy resources, in the Himalayas, the IOP, and the China will be, too happy, to claim, as their own. In fact large portions of the Himalayas have already been incorporated in the IOP and the Chinese territories. The Western and he Islamic nations are only interested in the Chinese and the, IOP, expansions, but not in India’s, future survival. Indians are busy as usual in their own in-fights(the 28 ‘Personal-States’), even, today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror of expansionism in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal). Read all about it in the Book: “India Divided Religion ‘Then’ 1947(East-West) ‘Now’ What Languages(North-South)? ISBN:9781462639755)” by ‘Mohin Jadarro Harappa’/PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

.

 

MOHIN HARAPPA

1:22 AM ET

March 20, 2012

Terrorist Enemy Who is It?

If you can judge the ‘terrorist enemy’ you can win the war too. To judge the enemy you have to understand their ways of expansion. At present, as before, for centuries, the Islam, is not fighting, a declared, war, of right or wrong. It is simply war of religious expansion at the cost of others. They are right and others are wrong. Their war is not from the top to bottom. It is fighting from bottom upwards. It is the war of intrusion and provocation. And that too in other’s lands. Here is typical example. Lahore was an ancient(Ramayana, Mahabharata era, 5000 B.C/India.) Indian city connecting the Himalayas in the north-west(Khyber Pass, Hindu Kush Mountains…) to the regions, in, the, north-east-south, of India e.g. Delhi, Allahabad, up to Mysore, etc., etc. It was, en-route, to the Islamic Armies, from Afghanistan(1000 A.D-1800 A.D.), to conquer, the whole, of India. Lahore, was also, the route, used by many traders, and the, Buddhist pilgrims, of whom, Huentseng, was, a, prominent, one, from China. He visited the Buddhist shrines, yearly, in north-east( Nepal, Allahabad, Lucknow, etc.), parts of India. Harshvrdhana who was the prominent Hindu King, during 600 A.D, of India, gave ‘Buddhism’ prominence, as, the, major, emerging religion, in India, at that time. Huensteng Diary, gave, a vivid description, of, Lahore, as, a, Hindu, city, with many hut-houses painted blue, of, the, Hindu-Brahmins, at that time. It was in,1000 A.D.. onwards, that, the invading Islamic Armies, destroyed, the Lahore, city, many times, and also destroyed, the Hindu temples, as well, and, built mosques and forts, for the spread of Islam, in India. Though the city saw new building, of Islamic architecture, as the local, new infrastructure, but, through its, ancestral routes, Lahore, remained very much, a, Hindu city, over centuries(1200-1800 A.D.). It, is, the local people(Hindus) who preserved, the, local Hindu-Buddhist culture; the Islamic, buildings, soon faded away, as the Islamic terrorist rulers, faded away too. After the arrival of the British, in Bengal, Lahore(1800 A.D.), became, a very strategic city, for the British, due to, its connections, with Tibet and China. Rana Ranjit Singh who was the King of Lahore(the capital of Punjab ) and the Punjab, up to the Khyber Pass, had stopped, the Islamic onslaught, of, Punjab, and Sindh, and also, of the rest of India, by that time. But, it, soon fell, to the, British forces(1900 A.D.) and Lahore, was revived, by the Hindu-Sikh human culture, and, glory, and the millions, migrated to the region, for its rich culture, and, the commerce. In 1947, due to freedom, form the British, India got divided, into two parts, the Muslim only, E-W, Pakistan(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal) and the rest, N-S, as secular only, India. At that time Millions fled as refugees and million got massacred, to feed into, the hunger, of, power and greed, of the Indi-Paki politicians, who have, never, apologized, to the victims, of their, the so called, freedom. Are they free now? They have had many wars since then. When is the next one? Probably, the final, the nuclear, one. The, Indians, are busy as usual, in their own, in-fights, even today. They have no time to worry about the ‘Islamic-Chinese’ terror, of expansionism, in the ‘Himalayas’, which are, ‘The Indian Lands’ like the PSB… ). Read all about it in the Book: ‘India Divided Religion then 1947(East-West)..Now Languages? ISBN: 9781462639755.)” by PublishAmerica, and buy at, http://www.publishamerica.net/

. . .

 

MAXIMB

12:36 AM ET

March 23, 2012

Yes and if your a man. You

Yes and if your a man. You might have to change your sex. Of course, you can be a heart-beat away from presidency. All you need is T&A and look look pretty!! :].

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

Stephen M. Walt is the Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University.

Read More